|
Home > Archive > Apache JDO Project > November 2005 > package.jdo Metadata for Company PC test classes
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
package.jdo Metadata for Company PC test classes
|
|
| Christian Ernst 2005-11-30, 5:45 pm |
| Hi
Is there a reason why
test/datastoreidentity/org/apache/jdo/tck/pc/company/package.jdo
don't define any persistence-capable-superclass
but
test/datastoreidentity/org/apache/jdo/tck/pc/company/package.jdo
defines them correctly ?
Is this not required for both scenario's ?
cheers
Christian
| |
| Christian Ernst 2005-11-30, 5:45 pm |
| Sorry, should be:
> test/datastoreidentity/org/apache/jdo/tck/pc/company/package.jdo
> don't define any persistence-capable-superclass
> but
'test/applicationidentity/org/apache/jdo/tck/pc/company/package.jdo'
> defines them correctly ?
>
> Is this not required for both scenario's ?
cheers Christian
| |
| Craig L Russell 2005-11-30, 5:45 pm |
| Hi Christian,
Actually, the persistence-capable-superclass attribute is a leftover
from JDO 1. It's no longer needed in JDO2. Since it's confusing,
could you enter a JIRA to remove it from wherever it appears?
Craig
On Nov 30, 2005, at 9:49 AM, Christian Ernst wrote:
> Sorry, should be:
>
>
> 'test/applicationidentity/org/apache/jdo/tck/pc/company/package.jdo'
>
>
> cheers Christian
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
| |
| Andy Jefferson 2005-11-30, 5:45 pm |
| > Is there a reason why
> test/datastoreidentity/org/apache/jdo/tck/pc/company/package.jdo
> don't define any persistence-capable-superclass
> but
> test/datastoreidentity/org/apache/jdo/tck/pc/company/package.jdo
> defines them correctly ?
>
> Is this not required for both scenario's ?
"persistence-capable-superclass" is deprecated in JDO2 IIRC, so shouldn't
affect the JDO implementation. No idea why it's like that though - maybe as a
test of the deprecated status :-)
--
Andy
| |
| Craig L Russell 2005-11-30, 5:45 pm |
| Hi,
On Nov 30, 2005, at 9:41 AM, Andy Jefferson wrote:
>
> "persistence-capable-superclass" is deprecated in JDO2 IIRC, so
> shouldn't
> affect the JDO implementation. No idea why it's like that though -
> maybe as a
> test of the deprecated status :-)
>
I'm sure it's an oversight.
Craig
>
> --
> Andy
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
|
|
|
|
|