Apache JDO Project - [jira] Commented: (JDO-268) org.apache.jdo.tck.api.instancecallbacks.InstanceLifecycle

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Apache JDO Project > December 2005 > [jira] Commented: (JDO-268) org.apache.jdo.tck.api.instancecallbacks.InstanceLifecycle





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author [jira] Commented: (JDO-268) org.apache.jdo.tck.api.instancecallbacks.InstanceLifecycle
Craig Russell (JIRA)

2005-12-28, 5:46 pm

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/brows...action_12361330 ]

Craig Russell commented on JDO-268:
-----------------------------------

The behavior of makePersistent should be the same as attachCopy in the case of the parameter being a detached instance. This is the only test case for the attach behavior, pending new test cases being written.

> org.apache.jdo.tck.api.instancecallbacks.InstanceLifecycleListenerAttach fails with new definition of makePersistent instead of attachCopy
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JDO-268
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-268
> Project: JDO
> Type: Bug
> Components: tck20
> Reporter: Craig Russell
> Assignee: Andy Jefferson


>
> The PersistenceManager method attachCopy was replaced by makePersistent. The test case now fails.


--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secur...nistrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com