|
Home > Archive > Apache JDO Project > September 2005 > TestFieldsOfObject patch
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
TestFieldsOfObject patch
|
|
| Michelle Caisse 2005-08-20, 5:45 pm |
| Any objections?
-- Michelle
| |
| Craig Russell 2005-08-20, 8:45 pm |
| | |
| Geoff hendrey 2005-08-22, 2:45 am |
| Well, I just bit the bullet and built in code to
serialize the objects when they are not PC's. Now that
we have a standardized mapping, this sort of ambiguity
will be harder to slide by, because the or-mapping
will be part of the test suite (right?).
-geoff
--- Craig Russell <Craig.Russell@Sun.COM> wrote:
> Hi Michelle,
>
> The test from JDO 1.0 would probably not pass most
> non-object
> database JDO implementations. I'm disappointed that
> no one (many
> claimed to have passed the JDO 1.0 TCK) complained
> about this test.
>
> The changes you suggest are fine with me.
>
> Craig
>
> On Aug 20, 2005, at 8:58 AM, Michelle Caisse wrote:
>
> test/java/org/apache/jdo/tck/models/fieldtypes/
>
========================================
===========================
> test/java/org/apache/jdo/tck/models/fieldtypes/
> test/java/org/apache/jdo/tck/models/fieldtypes/
> org.apache.jdo.tck.pc.fieldtypes.FieldsOfObject;
> org.apache.jdo.tck.pc.fieldtypes.SimpleClass;
> String("Hello");
> Integer("420");
> SimpleClass(1, "Hello");
> SimpleClass(333, "420");
> FieldsOfObject();
>
> Craig Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System
> http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
>
________________________________________
__________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
| |
| Craig Russell 2005-09-07, 8:45 pm |
| |
|
|
|
|