|
Home > Archive > Apache JDO Project > January 2006 > [VOTE] Release JDO2 beta
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
[VOTE] Release JDO2 beta
|
|
| Craig L Russell 2006-01-24, 5:47 pm |
| | |
| Michelle Caisse 2006-01-24, 8:45 pm |
| +1. Looks good!
-- Michelle
Craig L Russell wrote:
> The distribution of the tck source posted on 20-Jan-2006 was flawed,
> as discovered during testing of the bits from the site. The RunRules
> were confused and the distribution was missing a file necessary to
> test an IUT.
>
> The rest of the distribution passed the testing and has not been changed.
>
> I've uploaded new bits for the tck distribution to
> http://people.apache.org/~clr/downl...24_Jan_2006.zip
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eclr/dow...24_Jan_2006.zip>.
> The date on the file was changed.
>
> Since the bits were changed, I'll hold the voting open until Friday
> morning 27-Jan-2006. If you previously voted to release the
> distribution and you agree with the new distribution, you need not do
> anything. If you previously voted to release and change your mind,
> please reply.
>
> Craig
>
>
> Craig Russell
>
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
>
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
>
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
>
| |
| Martin Zaun 2006-01-27, 8:47 pm |
|
+1. Looking good! (Total tests run: 1154. Failures: 4, Errors: 12.)
Martin
Craig L Russell wrote:
>
> I've uploaded new bits for the tck distribution to
> http://people.apache.org/~clr/downl...4_Jan_2006.zip.
> The date on the file was changed.
>
> Since the bits were changed, I'll hold the voting open until Friday
> morning 27-Jan-2006. If you previously voted to release the distribution
> and you agree with the new distribution, you need not do anything. If
> you previously voted to release and change your mind, please reply.
| |
| Michael Bouschen 2006-01-27, 8:47 pm |
| Hi Martin,
you can decrease the number of Errors to 4, if you install
providerutil.jar and fscontext.jar in the lib/ext directory. Now a
couple of PMF test cases fail because of missing jndi impl.
Regards Michael
>
> +1. Looking good! (Total tests run: 1154. Failures: 4, Errors: 12.)
> Martin
>
> Craig L Russell wrote:
>
>
--
Michael Bouschen Tech@Spree Engineering GmbH
mailto:mbo.tech@spree.de http://www.tech.spree.de/
Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66
Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin
| |
| Thomas Fischer 2006-01-27, 8:47 pm |
|
+1
Thomas
|
|
|
|
|