| Michael Bouschen 2006-02-21, 5:45 pm |
| Hi Craig,
I rearranged the elements in orm.dtd to use the same order as in jdo.dtd
and found a couple of inconsistencies between orm.dtd and jdo.dtd. The
attached patch changes the orm.dtd to match the elements as defined in
jdo.dtd:
- Added subelement 'property' to element 'class'.
- Changed attribute 'strategy' in the element 'version' from REQUIRED to
IMPLIED.
- Fixed 'implement' subelements.
- Fixed order of subelements in elements 'inheritance'.
- Restricted the values of attribute 'primary-key' in element 'field'.
Please have a look at the patch. If there are no objections I would
check in the patch and change orm.xsd accordingly.
Regards Michael
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Feb 21, 2006, at 9:37 AM, Michael Bouschen wrote:
>
>
>
> Not ^M differences, but spaces (I think). I just looked at it again
> and I can't account for some of the diffs at all.
>
> But the main point is: good. Thanks for changing the files so they
> are as similar as possible. It will make it easier for us.
>
>
>
> Cool. I just looked at your 0220 patch and I think it's time to check
> these files in.
>
> Craig
>
>
>
> Craig Russell
> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>
--
Michael Bouschen Tech@Spree Engineering GmbH
mailto:mbo.tech@spree.de http://www.tech.spree.de/
Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66
Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin
|