| Craig Russell (JIRA) 2006-03-30, 11:57 pm |
| [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/brows...action_12372278 ]
Craig Russell commented on JDO-354:
-----------------------------------
When the tests were written, I think we didn't know exactly what we were going to test, and made extra classes persistent in order to have some flexibility.
Now that the tests are complete, it's not clear to me that we will ever extend the test cases so we don't need to keep the extra classes in the sql and orm.
So it's ok with me to remove the extras.
[vbcol=seagreen]
> org.apache.jdo.tck.api.persistencemanager.lifecycle.MakePersistent may fail on teardown
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JDO-354
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-354
> Project: JDO
> Type: Bug
> Components: tck20
> Versions: JDO 2 beta
> Reporter: Michelle Caisse
> Assignee: Michelle Caisse
> Fix For: JDO 2 final
> Attachments: JDO-354.patch
>
> When invoked from a configuration that does not use the default schema, MakePersistent fails because it queries for classes to tear down that do not exist in the current schema.
> testMakePersistent
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secur...nistrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
|