| Ilan Kirsh (JIRA) 2006-04-24, 7:58 am |
| [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/brows...action_12375894 ]
Ilan Kirsh commented on JDO-372:
--------------------------------
Both new patches (independently) look good. I just hope I followed all the changes exactly because I copied them manually. I am running the tests in the Eclipse IDE so I didn't notice the exclude list - where can I see it?
> ConcurrentPersistenceManagersSameClasses
- Failed on second run
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JDO-372
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-372
> Project: JDO
> Type: Bug
> Reporter: Ilan Kirsh
> Attachments: JDO-372-mbo.patch, JDO-372.patch, JDO-372.patch
>
> Thanks to deleteTearDownClasses / deleteTearDownInstances, most test cases can run on either a clean database or on an existing database. Unfortunately, it seems that org.apache.jdo.tck. ConcurrentPersistenceManagersSameClasses
is different. Old objects
are not deleted from the 2nd database that this test case uses, so findPoint may return more than one result object, and the first result that is checked might be an old object from a previous run. Therefore, the test case passes the first run and may fai
l on any additional run on the same database files.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secur...nistrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
|