|
Home > Archive > Apache JDO Project > April 2006 > [jira] Assigned: (JDO-375) Company model tables are not fully
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
[jira] Assigned: (JDO-375) Company model tables are not fully
|
|
| Michael Bouschen (JIRA) 2006-04-30, 1:11 pm |
| [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-375?page=all ]
Michael Bouschen reassigned JDO-375:
------------------------------------
Assign To: Erik Bengtson (was: Michael Bouschen)
I checked in the patch fixing getting the tearDown classes from the correct reader plus fixing list of tearDown classes in CompanyFactoryPMClass into the trunk and the 2.0 branch (see revision 398354).
I think the remaining issue from preventing a correct cleanup after the test is, that the extent of a persistent interface does not include any instances. I'm assigning this issue back to Erik.
> Company model tables are not fully cleaned up
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JDO-375
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-375
> Project: JDO
> Type: Bug
[vbcol=seagreen]
> Components: tck20
> Versions: JDO 2 rc1
> Reporter: Erik Bengtson
> Assignee: Erik Bengtson
> Fix For: JDO 2 final
> Attachments: JDO-375.patch
>
> Tables from company model does not appear to be clean after run.
> I can't say if this is a JPOX or TCK issue, because I did not dig into the issue.
> On second run, exceptions are like
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secur...nistrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
| |
| Craig L Russell 2006-04-30, 1:11 pm |
| | |
| Michael Bouschen 2006-04-30, 1:11 pm |
| Hi Craig,
> I think we should remove Person.class and Employee.class from the list
> of teardown classes in CompletenessTest. Having them there doesn't serve
> any purpose since no instances of these classes are created, and they
> can create issues when trying to remove instances using a different
> strategy.
>
> For example, look at http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-285 for
> other issues related to this.
>
> What do you think?
I agree. The changes are straightforward, I attached a patch to JDO-375.
Regards Michael
[vbcol=seagreen]
>
> Craig
>
> On Apr 30, 2006, at 8:11 AM, Michael Bouschen (JIRA) wrote:
>
[...]
--
Michael Bouschen Tech@Spree Engineering GmbH
mailto:mbo.tech@spree.de http://www.tech.spree.de/
Tel.:++49/30/235 520-33 Buelowstr. 66
Fax.:++49/30/2175 2012 D-10783 Berlin
|
|
|
|
|