| Erik Bengtson (JIRA) 2006-08-06, 7:11 am |
| [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/brows...action_12426048 ]
Erik Bengtson commented on JDO-402:
-----------------------------------
It was implicitly understood that the returned Set is immutable because the underlying Set is a reference. If the underlying set is a copy, it does not make sense to be immutable.
Anyway, I dont have any problem if it's changed to copy. In this case, making the returned set mutable is better for usability.
> checkRemoveGroup - removeGroup should be before getGroups
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JDO-402
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-402
> Project: JDO
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: tck20
> Affects Versions: JDO 2 final
> Reporter: Ilan Kirsh
> Assigned To: Craig Russell
> Fix For: JDO 2 maintenance release 1
>
> Attachments: JDO-402.patch
>
>
> In org.apache.jdo.tck.api.persistencemanager.fetchplan.FetchPlanInterface, lines 281-282,
> it probably has to be:
> fp.removeGroup("default");
> Collection groups = fp.getGroups();
> Instead of:
> Collection groups = fp.getGroups();
> fp.removeGroup("default");
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secur...nistrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
|