| Marc Prud'hommeaux (JIRA) 2006-08-30, 1:11 am |
| [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/brows...action_12431472 ]
Marc Prud'hommeaux commented on JDO-409:
----------------------------------------
You are correct about the title, and I agree that it is a duplicate. The fixed check in at http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/db/...ionalFalse.java looks correct to me.
> IsTransactionalFalse makes invalid assumption that transaction is optimistic
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JDO-409
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-409
> Project: JDO
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: tck20
> Affects Versions: JDO 2 final
> Reporter: Marc Prud'hommeaux
>
> The test IsTransactionalFalse.testIsTransactionalFalse mandates that an instance will be persistent-clean after a field is accessed in a transaction. However, when the transaction type is optimistic, it is also valid for the instance to be persistent-no
ntransactional after a field access.
> The test can be fixed by ensuring that the transaction is a datastore transaction. E.g.:
> public void testIsTransactionalFalse() {
> pm = getPM();
> Transaction tx = pm.currentTransaction();
> tx.setOptimistic(false); // make sure the transaction is not optimisitic
> tx.begin();
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secur...nistrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
|