| Ilan Kirsh (JIRA) 2006-09-10, 1:11 pm |
| [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/brows...action_12433708 ]
Ilan Kirsh commented on JDO-423:
--------------------------------
This issue still reflects a real (minor) problem, even though it is clear to me now that the solution that I suggested is invalid. I noticed that after a failure to delete the NoExtent instance once this test fails for all the next runs. Therefore, an al
ternative solution is still required.
Please forgive my ignorance, my familiarly with the TCK architecture is very limited. However, I will try another suggestion - maybe moving the addTearDownInstance to the beginning of the method is the solution? Maybe putting it in a finally block?
> Missing addTearDownClass in org.apache.jdo.tck.query.jdoql.variables.VariablesWithoutExtent
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JDO-423
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-423
> Project: JDO
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: tck20
> Affects Versions: JDO 2 final
> Reporter: Ilan Kirsh
> Priority: Minor
>
> Lines 101- 108, instead of:
> protected void localSetUp() {
> addTearDownClass(CompanyModelReader.getTearDownClasses());
> loadAndPersistCompanyModel(getPM());
> NoExtent noExtent = new NoExtent(1);
> makePersistent(noExtent);
> addTearDownInstance(noExtent);
> }
> should be:
> protected void localSetUp() {
> addTearDownClass(CompanyModelReader.getTearDownClasses());
> addTearDownClass(NoExtent.class); // Added missing addTearDownClass
> loadAndPersistCompanyModel(getPM());
> NoExtent noExtent = new NoExtent(1);
> makePersistent(noExtent);
> addTearDownInstance(noExtent);
> }
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secur...nistrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
|