Apache JDO Project - [jira] Commented: (JDO-390) JPOX fails new test: change to

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Apache JDO Project > March 2007 > [jira] Commented: (JDO-390) JPOX fails new test: change to





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author [jira] Commented: (JDO-390) JPOX fails new test: change to
Andy Jefferson (JIRA)

2007-03-31, 7:11 am


[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/brow...action_12485706 ]

Andy Jefferson commented on JDO-390:
------------------------------------

Don't totally understand what this test is checking for :-
The comments say "This tests that when a Date field is selected and modified, there is no change in the owned instance.". I interpret this as saying that if I do a query and get a Date field back then if I change that Date, the object in the datastore tha
t it relates to doesnt pick up that change. i.e the Date returned by the Query is not attached to anything.

OK, but the test actually gets a Date in that way and then sets the Date field of a Company object to be this returned Date and checks if the Company object is now dirty. JPOX has actually marked the Company as dirty (even though the date has the same val
ue - which is a minor bug since we should avoid any unnessary datastore update, and I'll fix that), but it is not consistent with the comments of the test.

Should the test not be getting the Date back from the Query, then change the Date "time" value, and then retrieve the Company to see if it was updated ? (this would then be consistent with the other test in that file which does that with an embedded field
).

> JPOX fails new test: change to projected Date field is reflected in the database
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JDO-390
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-390
> Project: JDO
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: tck2
> Affects Versions: JDO 2 maintenance release 1
> Reporter: Michelle Caisse
> Assigned To: Andy Jefferson
> Fix For: JDO 2 maintenance release 1
>
>
> Changes to a projected SCO should not be persisted to the data store. JPOX persists changes to a projected Date field in the new query.result.ProjectedSCODoesNotTrackChanges test.
>
> [java] 1) testDateField(org.apache.jdo.tck.query.result.ProjectedSCODoesNotTrackChanges)junit.framework.AssertionFailedError:
> [java] Expected Company instance not to be dirty; actual state is {persistent, transactional, dirty}
> [java] Expected projected field value is Fri Jun 23 21:53:29 PDT 2006; actual value is Wed Dec 31 16:02:03 PST 1969
> [java]
> [java] at org.apache.jdo.tck.JDO_Test.failOnError(JDO_Test.java:1052)
> [java] at org.apache.jdo.tck.query.result.ProjectedSCODoesNotTrackChanges. testDateField(ProjectedSCODoesNotTrackCh
anges.java:150)
> [java] at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> [java] at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
> [java] at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMet
> hodAccessorImpl.java:25)
> [java] at org.apache.jdo.tck.JDO_Test.runBare(JDO_Test.java:237)
> [java] at org.apache.jdo.tck.util.BatchTestRunner.doRun(BatchTestRunner.java:107)
> [java] at org.apache.jdo.tck.util.BatchTestRunner.start(BatchTestRunner.java:147)
> [java] at org.apache.jdo.tck.util.BatchTestRunner.main(BatchTestRunner.java:122)


--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com