| Michelle Caisse (JIRA) 2007-06-22, 7:11 pm |
|
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/brow...action_12507530 ]
Michelle Caisse commented on JDO-403:
-------------------------------------
Hi Andy,
Could you explain why @JoinTable and @SecondaryTable are needed? There is no equivalent in the xml metadata. I guess they are used to get table name/schema/catalog information into the annotations. Could we perhaps have a Table element in Join instead? A
nd allow a field target for Table as well as class, as with Join?
> JDO2 Annotations
> ----------------
>
> Key: JDO-403
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-403
> Project: JDO
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: api2
> Affects Versions: JDO 2 final
> Reporter: Andy Jefferson
> Assignee: Michelle Caisse
> Fix For: JDO 2 maintenance release 1
>
> Attachments: embedded.patch, jdo_2_1_annotations.jar
>
>
> It would be desirable for JDO2 to have its own set of annotations. We have developed a set within JPOX that would likely serve as a starting point for such a set. In my opinion they should be
> 1. Split into javax.jdo.annotations.jdo and javax.jdo.annotations.orm
> 2. Move ORM attributes from some of the JDO annotations and have a ORM annotation.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
|