| Craig Russell (JIRA) 2007-07-19, 1:11 am |
|
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/brow...action_12513769 ]
Craig Russell commented on JDO-403:
-----------------------------------
I notice that @ForeignKey, @Index, and @Unique use String [ ] fields() whereas @Embedded uses Field[ ] fields() as an element.
Should these be different, now that we have added String name() to @Field? Seems they should be consistent.
@Index(fields={
"field1",
"field2",
"field3"})
versus
@Index(fields={
@Field("field1"),
@Field("field2"),
@Field("field3")})
I guess it doesn't matter too much. There isn't any extra information needed from the field for Index, Unique, and ForeignKey...
> JDO2 Annotations
> ----------------
>
> Key: JDO-403
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-403
> Project: JDO
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: api2
> Affects Versions: JDO 2 final
> Reporter: Andy Jefferson
> Assignee: Michelle Caisse
> Fix For: JDO 2 maintenance release 1
>
> Attachments: annotations.patch, api2_property_table.patch, embedded.patch, jdo_2_1_annotations.jar, tck2a.patch, tck2b.patch
>
>
> It would be desirable for JDO2 to have its own set of annotations. We have developed a set within JPOX that would likely serve as a starting point for such a set. In my opinion they should be
> 1. Split into javax.jdo.annotations.jdo and javax.jdo.annotations.orm
> 2. Move ORM attributes from some of the JDO annotations and have a ORM annotation.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
|