Apache JDO Project - Re: Minor: change String[ ] fields( ) to Field[ ] fields( ) in @Index and @Unique

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Apache JDO Project > July 2007 > Re: Minor: change String[ ] fields( ) to Field[ ] fields( ) in @Index and @Unique





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Minor: change String[ ] fields( ) to Field[ ] fields( ) in @Index and @Unique
Andy Jefferson

2007-07-19, 1:11 am

Hi Craig,

> And fields() has type String[ ]. Now that we have the ability to put
> a name into Property and Field, should we change String[ ] fields()
> default { }


When specifying an index/unique with fields (or properties) would anyone=20
specify more than just the field names? The field itself is defined elsewhe=
re=20
and they only need give a reference to it. Think that was the reason I used


=2D-=20
Andy =A0(Java Persistent Objects - http://www.jpox.org)

Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com