Apache JDO Project - Re: [jira] Commented: (JDO-510) Remove @Field and @Property and replace them with @Per

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Apache JDO Project > July 2007 > Re: [jira] Commented: (JDO-510) Remove @Field and @Property and replace them with @Per





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: [jira] Commented: (JDO-510) Remove @Field and @Property and replace them with @Per
Andy Jefferson

2007-07-26, 1:11 am

Hi Craig,

> Given that we had fieldType and fieldTypes in @Field and @Property,
> and type and types in @Element, @Key, and @Value, I made them
> consistent by changing types to boundTypes in @Element, @Key, and
> @Value.
>
> Is this what we want? Or should we change boundTypes back to types
> for all four annotation types?


"boundTypes" does absolutely nothing for me. I don't see what is wrong=20
with "types" and "fieldTypes", and that is, after all, what the XML has.


=2D-=20
Andy =A0(Java Persistent Objects - http://www.jpox.org)

Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com