|
Home > Archive > Apache JDO Project > August 2007 > Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, Aug 10, 9 am PDT
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Minutes: JDO TCK Conference Call Friday, Aug 10, 9 am PDT
|
|
| Craig L Russell 2007-08-10, 1:11 pm |
| | |
| Andy Jefferson 2007-08-13, 1:11 pm |
| > 2. Annotations: discuss custom settings for enum-valued elements. We
> need better javadoc for UNKNOWN, and in fact we might change UNKNOWN
> to UNSPECIFIED so it's more clear from the name itself. AI Matthew
> raise this issue on the alias. It also seems like adding a new value
> of CUSTOM is unnecessary because if the user specifies a custom
> value, the annotation processor just uses it, and verifies that the
> standard strategy enum value is UNSPECIFIED.
@Persistence "valueStrategy"
@DatastoreIdentity "strategy"
+1 to rename of UNKNOWN to UNSPECIFIED, and use of "customStrategy"=20
(@DatastoreIdentity) / "customValueStrategy" (@Persistent) as per Craigs=20
proposal.
@Inheritance also has "strategy"
To allow implementations to define their own inheritance strategies can we=
=20
make the following changes
1. InheritanceStrategy : add UNSPECIFIED
2. @Inheritance : change "strategy" to have default of UNSPECIFIED
3. @Inheritance : add "customStrategy"
I was going to raise this a JIRA for this but Apache JIRA seems to be dead =
=2E..
=2D-=20
Andy =A0(Java Persistent Objects - http://www.jpox.org)
|
|
|
|
|