| Federico Bonelli (JIRA) 2005-12-13, 5:45 pm |
| [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/brows...action_12360367 ]
Federico Bonelli commented on DIRMINA-42:
-----------------------------------------
Yes, I planned to work it out because I need to resolve DIRMINA-93 for my applications.
Well, I'd like to work at this, but I'm new to team-development tecnique (I always worked alone), so I need a large amount of tips, i'd like to discuss every single choice.
I was thinking about that, about the hashMap vs Collection, and I don't know. I have many structure that need of a unique identifier that match every single connection, in my applications, but for every application my key is different.
I'm thinking about an ftp server that need of couple nick-ipaddr, about a chat server that need only ipaddr before login, then the nick after login, the neededs of every application is protocol specified...
For mina purpouse only (DIRMINA-93) a collection is all we need, but if we want to make this IoSessionMap usable for the highlevel application we need to develop a userdefinable hashing, pointing to our own collection, or maybe to another parallel mina-us
eless data structure dedicated for user-usage (that's the goal of DIRMINA-42)
So the key problem is worse then I thougth. What do you think about it?
> SessionManagers should manage list of sessions being managed.
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DIRMINA-42
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-42
> Project: Directory MINA
> Type: New Feature
> Versions: 0.7
> Reporter: Trustin Lee
> Assignee: Niklas Therning
> Fix For: 0.9.1
>
> Users are maintaining the list of managed sessions in acceptors and connectors. It will be much better if MINA can handle this.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secur...nistrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
|