Apache Directory Project - Re: [bdbje] [Licensing] Open Source verses Commercial Use

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Apache Directory Project > July 2005 > Re: [bdbje] [Licensing] Open Source verses Commercial Use





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: [bdbje] [Licensing] Open Source verses Commercial Use
David Boreham

2005-07-25, 5:45 pm

Paul Franz wrote:

> As a way around the redistribution restriction, couldn't a person
> create their application to use the Berkley DB JE API, but not
> redistribute it. Instead have the person installing the application
> grab it and install it separately. Therefore the person distributing
> the application would not be violating the license while still letting
> them develop against it.
>
> Is the above correct, or am I missing something?


I think this is called Redistribution by Proxy, and it's not allowed (or
rather
it puts you in exactly the same position wrt the licence as if you had
distributed the bits directly).

GPL'ed code like the JE basically makes you release all the source
code for the process into which you link it. This is one of the things
that the Apache Licence doesn't make you do, so they're fundamentally
different.

I guess Apache DS depends on a Java runtime, and Java isn't Apache Licensed,
but presumably that's not a problem...



Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com