|
Home > Archive > Apache Directory Project > December 2007 > [Documentation] Configuration stabilized in trunks`
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
[Documentation] Configuration stabilized in trunks`
|
|
| Alex Karasulu 2007-12-10, 7:11 pm |
| Hi guys,
Looks like a few folks were waiting for today when the bigbang was moved
over with a stable configuration so the documentation team can get to work
without having to deal with a moving target.
Just wanted to send out this email to make it clear that what we have in the
trunk will most likely be what we have in 2.0 as far as the configuration is
generally concerned. A slight tweak may occur who knows but this is the
responsibility of the tweaker to edit the documentation for an update of the
change.
As far as the documentation team is concerned the configuration is frozen.
Feel free to begin a 2.0 documentation stream.
Thanks,
Alex
| |
| Stefan Zoerner 2007-12-12, 7:11 pm |
| Alex Karasulu wrote:
> Looks like a few folks were waiting for today when the bigbang was moved
> over with a stable configuration so the documentation team can get to
> work without having to deal with a moving target.
You are absolutely right here, Alex. Thanks for clarifying this.
> Just wanted to send out this email to make it clear that what we have in
> the trunk will most likely be what we have in 2.0 as far as the
> configuration is generally concerned. A slight tweak may occur who
> knows but this is the responsibility of the tweaker to edit the
> documentation for an update of the change.
>
> As far as the documentation team is concerned the configuration is
> frozen. Feel free to begin a 2.0 documentation stream.
Currently, we have these cwiki spaces:
* Apache Directory Server v1.0 (DIRxSRVx10)
* Apache Directory Server v1.5 (DIRxSRVx11)
How about starting a new space for 2.0, which will not be published to
static pages at first?
Rationale: I do not want to modify/overwrite the 1.5 documentation,
because there are users out there, who need it. But I would like to
start the documentation for the simplified configuration style which
comes with 2.0. If we have a separate space, we could start with that
task, and make the content available on directory.apache.org if needed.
Thoughts? Christine?
Greetings from Hamburg,
Stefan
---8<---
Stefan Zoerner (szoerner-1oDqGaOF3Lkdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org)
Committer :: PMC Member
Apache Directory Project
http://directory.apache.org
| |
| Alex Karasulu 2007-12-12, 7:11 pm |
| On Dec 12, 2007 4:23 PM, Stefan Zoerner <szoerner-1oDqGaOF3Lkdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> How about starting a new space for 2.0, which will not be published to
> static pages at first?
>
> Rationale: I do not want to modify/overwrite the 1.5 documentation,
> because there are users out there, who need it. But I would like to
> start the documentation for the simplified configuration style which
> comes with 2.0. If we have a separate space, we could start with that
> task, and make the content available on directory.apache.org if needed.
>
> Thoughts?
Oh yes that's a good idea! I would just go ahead and request the space
creation from infra. If someone objects we can always remove it but I doubt
anyone would. Once 2.0 is out and the documentation is complete we can just
delete this 1.5 (labeled 1.1) space.
Alex
| |
| Emmanuel Lecharny 2007-12-12, 7:11 pm |
| Stefan Zoerner wrote:
>
> Currently, we have these cwiki spaces:
>
> * Apache Directory Server v1.0 (DIRxSRVx10)
> * Apache Directory Server v1.5 (DIRxSRVx11)
>
> How about starting a new space for 2.0, which will not be published to
> static pages at first?
That would be the best solution, IMO. We can ask for a special space,
but not directly pointed by the web site, so that we can benefit from
the current editing system we have (the little icon on top right of each
page).
>
> Rationale: I do not want to modify/overwrite the 1.5 documentation,
> because there are users out there, who need it. But I would like to
> start the documentation for the simplified configuration style which
> comes with 2.0. If we have a separate space, we could start with that
> task, and make the content available on directory.apache.org if needed.
Totally agree with you.
>
> Thoughts? Christine?
--
--
cordialement, regards,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
directory.apache.org
| |
| Ersin Er 2007-12-13, 7:11 am |
| http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DIRxSRVx20
Granted write access to all directory commiters.
Not yet being published as static pages.
Not viewable by anonymous users.
On Dec 13, 2007 12:38 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny@gmail.com> wrote:
> Stefan Zoerner wrote:
> That would be the best solution, IMO. We can ask for a special space,
> but not directly pointed by the web site, so that we can benefit from
> the current editing system we have (the little icon on top right of each
> page).
> Totally agree with you.
>
>
> --
> --
> cordialement, regards,
> Emmanuel LĂ©charny
> www.iktek.com
> directory.apache.org
>
>
>
--
Ersin Er
| |
| Alex Karasulu 2007-12-13, 7:11 am |
| Thanks Ersin.
Alex
On Dec 13, 2007 4:16 AM, Ersin Er <ersin.er-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DIRxSRVx20
>
> Granted write access to all directory commiters.
>
> Not yet being published as static pages.
>
> Not viewable by anonymous users.
>
>
> On Dec 13, 2007 12:38 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> --
> Ersin Er
| |
| Stefan Zoerner 2007-12-13, 7:11 pm |
| Ersin Er wrote:
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DIRxSRVx20
>
> Granted write access to all directory commiters.
>
> Not yet being published as static pages.
>
> Not viewable by anonymous users.
Thanks, Ersin!
I have started to move and revise the Basic Users's Guide
Greetings,
Stefan
|
|
|
|
|