|
Home > Archive > Apache Directory Project > December 2007 > Questions about using 1.5.2-SNAPSHOT
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Questions about using 1.5.2-SNAPSHOT
|
|
| Simon.Temple-bNHniqfy2KDk7dXyY5I9mNBPR1lH4CV8@ 2007-12-20, 1:11 pm |
| I have code that supports an embedded DS in JBoss. The following importsthat were valid in 1.5.1 no longer appear to be valid in 1.5.2.
import org.apache.directory.server.changepw.ChangePasswordConfiguration;
import org.apache.directory.server.configuration.MutableServerStartupConfiguration;
import org.apache.directory.server.core.configuration.ShutdownConfiguration;
import org.apache.directory.server.core.configuration.SyncConfiguration;
import org.apache.directory.server.core.partition.impl.btree.MutableBTreePartitionConfiguration;
import org.apache.directory.server.core.partition.impl.btree.MutableIndexConfiguration;
import org.apache.directory.server.dns.DnsConfiguration;
import org.apache.directory.server.jndi.ServerContextFactory;
import org.apache.directory.server.kerberos.kdc.KdcConfiguration;
import org.apache.directory.server.ldap.LdapConfiguration;
import org.apache.directory.server.ntp.NtpConfiguration;
Could you confirm this and advise me of where I can find information on these changes/refactoring?
TIA
SimonT
| |
| Alex Karasulu 2007-12-20, 1:11 pm |
| Yep this is the case. You might want to search the archives for [BigBang]
tagged threads to get the background on all this.
Alex
On Dec 20, 2007 9:00 AM, <Simon.Temple-bNHniqfy2KDk7dXyY5I9mNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> I have code that supports an embedded DS in JBoss. The following imports
> that were valid in 1.5.1 no longer appear to be valid in 1.5.2.
>
> import org.apache.directory.server.changepw.ChangePasswordConfiguration;
> import
> org.apache.directory.server.configuration.MutableServerStartupConfiguration
> ;
> import
> org.apache.directory.server.core.configuration.ShutdownConfiguration;
> import org.apache.directory.server.core.configuration.SyncConfiguration;
> import
> org.apache.directory.server.core.partition.impl.btree.MutableBTreePartitionConfiguration
> ;
> import
> org.apache.directory.server.core.partition.impl.btree.MutableIndexConfiguration
> ;
> import org.apache.directory.server.dns.DnsConfiguration;
> import org.apache.directory.server.jndi.ServerContextFactory;
> import org.apache.directory.server.kerberos.kdc.KdcConfiguration;
> import org.apache.directory.server.ldap.LdapConfiguration;
> import org.apache.directory.server.ntp.NtpConfiguration;
> Could you confirm this and advise me of where I can find information on
> these changes/refactoring?
>
> TIA
>
> SimonT
>
| |
| Jörg Henne 2007-12-20, 1:11 pm |
| <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Simon.Temple-bNHniqfy2KDk7dXyY5I9mNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org">Simon.Temple-bNHniqfy2KDk7dXyY5I9mNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org</a> schrieb:
<blockquote
cite="mid:OFA1C0F5AC.99FE87CF-ON802573B7.004CDF31-EAKjekeBQ1Dk7dXyY5I9mNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; ">
<meta content="MSHTML 6.00.3790.2541" name="GENERATOR">
<div><font
style="font-weight: normal; font-size: 10pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-style: normal; font-family: Tahoma;">I
have code that supports an embedded DS in JBoss. The following imports
that were valid in 1.5.1 no longer appear to be valid in 1.5.2.</font></div>
<div> </div>
</blockquote>
some time ago I brought the server-sar to make it compatible with the
latest 1.5 series builds. I did this by abandoning the approach of
configuring everything from MBean attributes and using a configuration
loaded from a standard server.xml instead. Let me know if you are
interested in this code.<br>
<br>
Joerg Henne<br>
</body>
</html>
| |
| Alex Karasulu 2007-12-20, 1:11 pm |
| Why don't you guys just revive the old sar module? I think Emmanuel moved
it over to the sandbox after a vote since no one was using or maintaining
it.
We need to learn how to work better together instead of going away for a
while and then coming back with stuff to contribute in bulk. We dropped the
bar and made several people committers just to facilitate this. It's much
easier to just keep committing here on relevant pieces with a slow trickle
and using that then having things progress so much it requires significant
time to review and incorporate.
Regards,
Alex
On Dec 20, 2007 11:34 AM, Jörg Henne <j.henne-EfRxLUFLFsSzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Simon.Temple-bNHniqfy2KDk7dXyY5I9mNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org schrieb:
>
> I have code that supports an embedded DS in JBoss. The following imports
> that were valid in 1.5.1 no longer appear to be valid in 1.5.2.
>
>
> some time ago I brought the server-sar to make it compatible with the
> latest 1.5 series builds. I did this by abandoning the approach of
> configuring everything from MBean attributes and using a configuration
> loaded from a standard server.xml instead. Let me know if you are
> interested in this code.
>
> Joerg Henne
>
| |
| Jörg Henne 2007-12-20, 1:11 pm |
| Alex Karasulu wrote:
> Why don't you guys just revive the old sar module? I think Emmanuel
> moved it over to the sandbox after a vote since no one was using or
> maintaining it.
>
> We need to learn how to work better together instead of going away for
> a while and then coming back with stuff to contribute in bulk. We
> dropped the bar and made several people committers just to facilitate
> this. It's much easier to just keep committing here on relevant
> pieces with a slow trickle and using that then having things progress
> so much it requires significant time to review and incorporate.
You are absolutely right in that bulk contributions like this are
sub-optimal. There are several reasons for why we dealt with it in the
way I/we (levigo) did, however:
- Reluctance to actually commit code. This may be for whatever reasons -
it being not really production ready or whatever. I felt more
comfortable with bringing the stuff up to a reasonable state within our
own code base and then coming back. Though I can see that the other way
around it would have been more rational: the current DHCP code within
Apache DS, albeit incomplete and non-working, was nevertheless useful
for us as a starting point. Well, I guess this can simply be overcome.
- Practical reasons like the fact that I am not the only one within our
team working on the code. In facht, I have not been working on it for
quite some time, while others did.
- A conflict of interests: wearing the openthinclient.org cap I am
interested in a stable version, so it makes sense to work with one as a
starting point. With the Apache DS it is obvious that the trunk is the
way to go. Keeping both points of view balanced isn't that easy.
Joerg Henne
|
|
|
|
|