Apache Directory Project - [jira] Updated: (DIRSERVER-824) Collective attributes are not

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Apache Directory Project > February 2007 > [jira] Updated: (DIRSERVER-824) Collective attributes are not





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author [jira] Updated: (DIRSERVER-824) Collective attributes are not
Alex Karasulu (JIRA)

2007-02-23, 7:11 pm


[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/brow...ls:all-tabpanel ]

Alex Karasulu updated DIRSERVER-824:
------------------------------------

Fix Version/s: (was: 1.5.0)
1.5.1

Emmanuel you're right this is a tough problem to solve efficiently. I'll put this one off until after 1.5.0.

Incidentally one way to implement this would be to give search some extra attributes to consider while attempting to match for the filter. These additional attributes can be merged into the entry used for evaluation. This away any attribute can be injec
ted into an entry to effect evaluation regardless of the partition implementation.

Actually with this mechanism we can support several virtual/dynamic attributes. What do you think about this idea?

> Collective attributes are not evaluated in search operations when they are used in filter expressions
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DIRSERVER-824
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-824
> Project: Directory ApacheDS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 1.0.1, 1.5.0
> Reporter: Ersin Er
> Fix For: 1.5.1
>
>
> As collective attributes never hit the database, they are not evaluated upon search operations if they are used in filters. This is an hard issue to fix but we may also support this kind of virtual attributes in the future, so we need a way to handle su

ch cases. One solution can be injecting the collective attributes into entries before search operations. Other LDAP servers may be doing this. (I had felt this when I read their documents.) Hoever I am not sure about the negative effects of that way on pe
rformance.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com