Apache Directory Project - Re: [jira] Commented: (DIRSERVER-1010) Should the order in which

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Apache Directory Project > July 2007 > Re: [jira] Commented: (DIRSERVER-1010) Should the order in which





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: [jira] Commented: (DIRSERVER-1010) Should the order in which
Ole Ersoy

2007-07-26, 1:11 pm

Hey Emmanuel,

I went ahead and closed it. It's pretty minor. I have a feeling the order should not matter though. The DAS partition and the schema partition are independent. The layout looks like this:

ou=das
ou=schema

If it were like this or flipped:
ou=das, ou=schema

then I would understand why the order matters.

Thanks,
- Ole




Emmanuel Lecharny (JIRA) wrote:
> [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/brow...action_12515625 ]
>
> Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRSERVER-1010:
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Actually, as you can see in the stack trace, if you invert the order, there is a search done in the partition table, and if the partition does not exist, you get an error. So, basically, yes, order matters.
>
>


Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com