|
Home > Archive > Apache Directory Project > August 2007 > [ApacheDS][Release] Requesting that PMC consider expedited 36 hr vote for 1.5.1
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
[ApacheDS][Release] Requesting that PMC consider expedited 36 hr vote for 1.5.1
|
|
| Alex Karasulu 2007-08-30, 1:11 pm |
| Hi PMC,
NOTE: I put this out there on the dev list purposely so all can see.
This is a special request to the PMC to keep the voting period down to 36
hrs instead of
72 for the 1.5.1 release. It is an exceptional condition and this is not
something we will get
into a habit of doing. I am asking this for several reasons:
o We have a tight release schedule
o Most of us will be traveling and need a quick conclusion to the vote so
we may be present to
release the artifacts properly
o If there is a blip that requires fixes followed by another release vote,
then we will still have a
chance at making this all happen in time for LDAP con.
o This is a feature introduction release (NOT a production release)
o Most of the binding voters are going to be release artifact testers who
are diligently testing
installers, servers and apps as we speak: so waiting on them to test the
goods is not an
issue.
Can we get a majority of the PMC to quickly +1 (approve) this request?
Thanks,
Alex
| |
| Emmanuel Lecharny 2007-08-30, 1:11 pm |
| I +1 this proposal.
We are now so close to the Ldap cponference that we need to move fast,
mainly due to travel time of two of our majors committers (Alex and
Chris)
thanks Alex !
On 8/30/07, Alex Karasulu <akarasulu-1oDqGaOF3Lkdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Hi PMC,
>
> NOTE: I put this out there on the dev list purposely so all can see.
>
> This is a special request to the PMC to keep the voting period down to 36
> hrs instead of
> 72 for the 1.5.1 release. It is an exceptional condition and this is not
> something we will get
> into a habit of doing. I am asking this for several reasons:
>
> o We have a tight release schedule
> o Most of us will be traveling and need a quick conclusion to the vote s=
o
> we may be present to
> release the artifacts properly
> o If there is a blip that requires fixes followed by another release vot=
e,
> then we will still have a
> chance at making this all happen in time for LDAP con.
> o This is a feature introduction release (NOT a production release)
> o Most of the binding voters are going to be release artifact testers wh=
o
> are diligently testing
> installers, servers and apps as we speak: so waiting on them to test =
the
> goods is not an
> issue.
>
> Can we get a majority of the PMC to quickly +1 (approve) this request?
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
--=20
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel L=E9charny
www.iktek.com
| |
| Alex Karasulu 2007-08-30, 1:11 pm |
| +1
Alex
On 8/30/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <elecharny-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> I +1 this proposal.
>
> We are now so close to the Ldap cponference that we need to move fast,
> mainly due to travel time of two of our majors committers (Alex and
> Chris)
>
> thanks Alex !
>
> On 8/30/07, Alex Karasulu <akarasulu-1oDqGaOF3Lkdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> 36
> not
> so
> vote,
> who
> the
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
>
| |
| Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot 2007-08-30, 1:11 pm |
| +1 for a 36 hours voting period instead of the standard 72 hours period.
P-A
On 8/30/07, Alex Karasulu <akarasulu-1oDqGaOF3Lkdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> Hi PMC,
>
> NOTE: I put this out there on the dev list purposely so all can see.
>
> This is a special request to the PMC to keep the voting period down to 36
> hrs instead of
> 72 for the 1.5.1 release. It is an exceptional condition and this is not
> something we will get
> into a habit of doing. I am asking this for several reasons:
>
> o We have a tight release schedule
> o Most of us will be traveling and need a quick conclusion to the vote so
> we may be present to
> release the artifacts properly
> o If there is a blip that requires fixes followed by another release
> vote, then we will still have a
> chance at making this all happen in time for LDAP con.
> o This is a feature introduction release (NOT a production release)
> o Most of the binding voters are going to be release artifact testers who
> are diligently testing
> installers, servers and apps as we speak: so waiting on them to test
> the goods is not an
> issue.
>
> Can we get a majority of the PMC to quickly +1 (approve) this request?
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
| |
| Chris Custine 2007-08-30, 1:11 pm |
| +1
On 8/30/07, Alex Karasulu <akarasulu-1oDqGaOF3Lkdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> Hi PMC,
>
> NOTE: I put this out there on the dev list purposely so all can see.
>
> This is a special request to the PMC to keep the voting period down to 36
> hrs instead of
> 72 for the 1.5.1 release. It is an exceptional condition and this is not
> something we will get
> into a habit of doing. I am asking this for several reasons:
>
> o We have a tight release schedule
> o Most of us will be traveling and need a quick conclusion to the vote so
> we may be present to
> release the artifacts properly
> o If there is a blip that requires fixes followed by another release
> vote, then we will still have a
> chance at making this all happen in time for LDAP con.
> o This is a feature introduction release (NOT a production release)
> o Most of the binding voters are going to be release artifact testers who
> are diligently testing
> installers, servers and apps as we speak: so waiting on them to test
> the goods is not an
> issue.
>
> Can we get a majority of the PMC to quickly +1 (approve) this request?
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
| |
| Ersin Er 2007-08-30, 7:11 pm |
| +1
On 8/30/07, Alex Karasulu <akarasulu-1oDqGaOF3Lkdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> Hi PMC,
>
> NOTE: I put this out there on the dev list purposely so all can see.
>
> This is a special request to the PMC to keep the voting period down to 36
> hrs instead of
> 72 for the 1.5.1 release. It is an exceptional condition and this is not
> something we will get
> into a habit of doing. I am asking this for several reasons:
>
> o We have a tight release schedule
> o Most of us will be traveling and need a quick conclusion to the vote so
> we may be present to
> release the artifacts properly
> o If there is a blip that requires fixes followed by another release
> vote, then we will still have a
> chance at making this all happen in time for LDAP con.
> o This is a feature introduction release (NOT a production release)
> o Most of the binding voters are going to be release artifact testers who
> are diligently testing
> installers, servers and apps as we speak: so waiting on them to test
> the goods is not an
> issue.
>
> Can we get a majority of the PMC to quickly +1 (approve) this request?
>
> Thanks,
> Alex
>
--
Ersin Er
http://www.ersin-er.name
|
|
|
|
|