| Chris Blunt 2005-12-29, 5:46 pm |
| On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 22:07:18 GMT, "Jono" <no@nospamblueyonder.co.uk>
wrote:
>
>
>Chris Blunt wrote:
>|| On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:30:04 GMT, "Jono" <no@nospamblueyonder.co.uk>
>|| wrote:
>||
>|||
>|||
>||| Ivor Jones wrote:
>||||| "Sean" <seanhardy88NOSPAM@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>||||| news:dp1dt7$i2l$1@news.freedom2surf.net
>|||||
>||||| [snip]
>|||||
>|||||| BT Supply caller redirect.. It costs £15 a month.. which
>|||||| is more than line rental of a normal line.
>||||||
>|||||| Callers get a message like "The number you have called
>|||||| has changed, it is now 020 0000 0000"
>|||||
>||||| Cheaper to pay the rental and leave an answering machine on..!
>|||||
>||||| Ivor
>|||
>||| It's possible that the Original Poster could do this, however, he's
>||| moving out of the country for 2 years. Even if he had OGCB, I
>||| wouldn't trust tenants to /not/ receive reverse charge calls.
>||
>|| They could only do that if they were aware of the existence of the
>|| line and its number. I'd remove the master socket, and conceal the
>|| remnants of the wiring in such a way that nobody would even know it
>|| was there. Then take up the option to receive paperless bills via the
>|| internet, so no postal mail from BT would arrive at the house.
>||
>|| Chris
>
>........and if the tennant rings BT for a "Free Re-connection"?
I suppose he *might*. Then get him a separate line put in before
leaving.
Chris
|