Voice Over IP in UK - Grandstream ATA and VoIPBuster

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Voice Over IP in UK > June 2005 > Grandstream ATA and VoIPBuster





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Grandstream ATA and VoIPBuster
David Floyd

2005-06-06, 7:45 am

Anyone got this to work since they've come back for new beta users?

I have registered with their software and got Username and Password.

ATA settings are:
SIP Server: sip.voipbuster.com
Outbound Proxy: sip.voipbuster.com
SIP User ID: my Username
Authenticate ID: my Username
Authenticate Password: my Password
Vocoder: PCMU, PCMA
Ports: 5060 5004
Stun: YES - stun.voipbuster.com
Proxy-Require: <blank>
FXS Imp: CTR21
Caller ID Scheme: ETSI-FSK
Onhook Voltage: 48
Special Feature: Standard

Is there anything I've missed, or got wrong.

Any help appreciated.

David
Dave Gill

2005-06-06, 7:45 am

David Floyd <david@floyd.org.uk> wrote:

> Outbound Proxy: sip.voipbuster.com

[...]
> Stun: YES - stun.voipbuster.com


Surely you don't really need to specify an outbound proxy if you're
using STUN?

--
The From address is a spam-trap, so all replies to the newsgroup please.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Be Alert, Your Country Needs More Lerts! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
David Floyd

2005-06-06, 7:45 am

In message of Sat, 28 May 2005, Dave Gill writes
>David Floyd <david@floyd.org.uk> wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>Surely you don't really need to specify an outbound proxy if you're
>using STUN?
>

Probably not; but it still doesn't work if either of these is deleted
(made blank).

David
Jono

2005-06-06, 7:45 am


"David Floyd" <david@floyd.org.uk> wrote in message
news:rxJQGpVrjHmCFwUh@127.0.0.1...
> Anyone got this to work since they've come back for new beta users?
>
> I have registered with their software and got Username and Password.
>
> ATA settings are:
> SIP Server: sip.voipbuster.com
> Outbound Proxy: sip.voipbuster.com
> SIP User ID: my Username
> Authenticate ID: my Username
> Authenticate Password: my Password
> Vocoder: PCMU, PCMA
> Ports: 5060 5004
> Stun: YES - stun.voipbuster.com
> Proxy-Require: <blank>
> FXS Imp: CTR21
> Caller ID Scheme: ETSI-FSK
> Onhook Voltage: 48
> Special Feature: Standard
>
> Is there anything I've missed, or got wrong.
>
> Any help appreciated.
>
> David


I thought it said on their site that only their softphone could be used from
now on?


David Floyd

2005-06-06, 7:45 am

In message of Sat, 28 May 2005, Jono writes
>
>"David Floyd" <david@floyd.org.uk> wrote in message
>news:rxJQGpVrjHmCFwUh@127.0.0.1...
>
>I thought it said on their site that only their softphone could be used from
>now on?
>
>


I agree, except that their site says (I think) that they are not
supporting SIP devices, but dcuk said in another thread that it works
for him :-(

David
Ivor Jones

2005-06-06, 7:45 am

Dave Gill wrote:
> David Floyd <david@floyd.org.uk> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> Surely you don't really need to specify an outbound proxy if you're
> using STUN?


Sipgate specifiy that you should, not tried it without..! Do you have to
specify a port number for STUN..?

Ivor


AlexDeag

2005-06-06, 7:45 am


"David Floyd" <david@floyd.org.uk> wrote in message
news:rxJQGpVrjHmCFwUh@127.0.0.1...
> Anyone got this to work since they've come back for new beta users?
>
> I have registered with their software and got Username and Password.
>
> ATA settings are:
> SIP Server: sip.voipbuster.com
> Outbound Proxy: sip.voipbuster.com
> SIP User ID: my Username
> Authenticate ID: my Username
> Authenticate Password: my Password
> Vocoder: PCMU, PCMA
> Ports: 5060 5004
> Stun: YES - stun.voipbuster.com
> Proxy-Require: <blank>
> FXS Imp: CTR21
> Caller ID Scheme: ETSI-FSK
> Onhook Voltage: 48
> Special Feature: Standard
>
> Is there anything I've missed, or got wrong.
>
> Any help appreciated.
>
> David



Have you seent this on this page

http://www.voipbuster.com/en/newsflash.html

" Temporarily, we will not support SIP-calls. SIP-users, for the time being
please use the fully available VoipBuster application instead. "



David Floyd

2005-06-06, 7:45 am

In message of Sat, 28 May 2005, Ivor Jones writes
>Dave Gill wrote:
>
>Sipgate specifiy that you should, not tried it without..! Do you have to
>specify a port number for STUN..?
>


Well I don't use an Outbound Proxy with Sipgate; and it works. (When
Sipgate isn't down, that is)

David
Ivor Jones

2005-06-06, 7:45 am

David Floyd wrote:
> In message of Sat, 28 May 2005, Ivor Jones writes
>
> Well I don't use an Outbound Proxy with Sipgate; and it works. (When
> Sipgate isn't down, that is)
>
> David


Interesting. The info on Sipgate's site specific to the Sipura that I use
specifies using "sipgate.co.uk" as an outbound proxy, I'll have to try
removing it and seeing what happens. They also use port 10000 for STUN as
well, which is non-standard. MAybe voipbuster use the standard port (can't
remember it offhand..!) so it isn't specified..?

Ivor


dcuk

2005-06-06, 7:45 am

David Floyd wrote:
> Anyone got this to work since they've come back for new beta users?
>
> I have registered with their software and got Username and Password.
>
> ATA settings are:
> SIP Server: sip.voipbuster.com
> Outbound Proxy: sip.voipbuster.com
> SIP User ID: my Username
> Authenticate ID: my Username
> Authenticate Password: my Password
> Vocoder: PCMU, PCMA
> Ports: 5060 5004
> Stun: YES - stun.voipbuster.com
> Proxy-Require: <blank>
> FXS Imp: CTR21
> Caller ID Scheme: ETSI-FSK
> Onhook Voltage: 48
> Special Feature: Standard
>
> Is there anything I've missed, or got wrong.
>
> Any help appreciated.
>
> David


Is it not registering at all for you?

Voipbuster is the only one that works for me. I can register with the
server and make calls. Neither 18866 or 1899 work for me with voip. I an
register with the server but all calls fail.
Dave Gill

2005-06-06, 7:45 am

Ivor Jones <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:

> Sipgate specifiy that you should, not tried it without..! Do you have to
> specify a port number for STUN..?


I've got my GS ATA-486 up and running (again) with my Sipgate account
with NAT forwarding and STUN without an outbound proxy, and my Sipura
SPA-1001 is running Gradwell and JustDialVoip accounts using outbound
proxies but no STUN, and both seem fine.

I don't know if the STUN port needs to be specified or not, I suppose it
makes the router port-forwarding easier if it is. Although it's just
occurred to me that if you use an ATA-486 in router mode it will only
see open Internet on its "WAN" side anyway, so NAT/STUN shouldn't be an
issue...

--
The From address is a spam-trap, so all replies to the newsgroup please.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Be Alert, Your Country Needs More Lerts! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
David Floyd

2005-06-06, 7:45 am

In message of Sat, 28 May 2005, AlexDeag writes
>
>"David Floyd" <david@floyd.org.uk> wrote in message
>news:rxJQGpVrjHmCFwUh@127.0.0.1...
[vbcol=seagreen]
>
>Have you seent this on this page
>
>http://www.voipbuster.com/en/newsflash.html
>
>" Temporarily, we will not support SIP-calls. SIP-users, for the time being
>please use the fully available VoipBuster application instead. "
>
>
>


Yes, but dcuk said in another thread, that it was working for him. I
don't believe him now.

DF


David Floyd

2005-06-06, 7:45 am

In message of Sat, 28 May 2005, dcuk writes
>David Floyd wrote:
>
>Is it not registering at all for you?


No!

>
>Voipbuster is the only one that works for me.


Other people are saying that VoIPBuster are not supporting SIP at all.

>I can register with the server and make calls.


So is your GS 486 set up like mine, above?

David

7

2005-06-06, 7:45 am

David Floyd wrote:

> Anyone got this to work since they've come back for new beta users?
>
> I have registered with their software and got Username and Password.
>
> ATA settings are:
> SIP Server: sip.voipbuster.com
> Outbound Proxy: sip.voipbuster.com


For some (not all) sites, you need to
drop "sip." bit in one or both of the addresses.

dexter@blueyonder.co.uk

2005-06-06, 7:45 am

On Sat, 28 May 2005 17:13:42 +0100, David Floyd <david@floyd.org.uk>
wrote:


> (When Sipgate isn't down, that is)

Ha ha we do keep playing the same old tune regarding Sipgate don't we
David justifiably of course ))))))))))))))))))))))))).
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com