|
Home > Archive > Voice Over IP in UK > May 2006 > Sipura retail?
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
|
|
| me@privacy.net 2006-05-12, 7:11 pm |
| I am looking to buy a Sipura ATA from a shop in London. Where? Thank
you.
| |
| me@privacy.net 2006-05-13, 1:11 pm |
| On Sat, 13 May 2006 00:09:25 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>I am looking to buy a Sipura ATA from a shop in London. Where? Thank
>you.
Get a pap2 from Currys digital and unlock it. Only £19.99. RRP £50+
| |
| Ivor Jones 2006-05-13, 1:11 pm |
|
<me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:m0lb62tq7smphlbvkcgajuv14g4g496of4@
4ax.com
> On Sat, 13 May 2006 00:09:25 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
> Get a pap2 from Currys digital and unlock it. Only
> £19.99. RRP £50+
A PAP2 is not a Sipura. Ok it is in effect, but it isn't, if you know what
I mean. Besides, the OP didn't say which Sipura he wanted. The PAP2 is
effectively an SPA-2000 in different clothes, but it definitely isn't a
3000 or a 1001..!
Ivor
| |
| Brian A 2006-05-13, 7:11 pm |
| On Sat, 13 May 2006 13:42:44 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>On Sat, 13 May 2006 00:09:25 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
>Get a pap2 from Currys digital and unlock it. Only £19.99. RRP £50+
There are risks doing this.
If you succeeed in unlocking I'd be interested in what method you
used. I know that it can be very risky - easy to end up with a
paperwieght!
Remove 'no_spam_' from email address.
| |
| Graham 2006-05-13, 7:11 pm |
| On the strength of a posting on this newsgroup I bought one a few weeks ago.
Five Minutes Googleing and I had detailed instructions
A further ten Minutes was required to get the two .bin files required
This was because Linksys (Ci$co) had threatened legal action to sites that
they found carrying them. I won't therefore provide a link here.
I will simply suggest you Google the filenames.bin when you discover what
they are called.
You also need a TFTP server running to upload to the PAP, I used the free
one from http://solarwinds.net/Download-Tools.htm
It was also suggested that if the PAP in its Vonage guise was exposed to the
Internet
it could somehow download a patch that would thwart your efforts so I didn't
take any chances and disconnected the phone line from the router.
Basically you upload the first file, log into the web interface, turn off
theVonage "provisioning" then upload the second file, which I suppose is the
clean pap2 version.
I suppose there was some risk; my main fear is the files may have been
planted to kill the ATA!
Inviato da X-Privat.Org - Registrazione gratuita http://www.x-privat.org/join.php
| |
| Thomas Kenyon 2006-05-14, 1:11 am |
| Graham wrote:
> I suppose there was some risk; my main fear is the files may have been
> planted to kill the ATA!
>
You were lucky, this security hole was plugged a while back.
| |
|
| Ivor Jones wrote:
>
> A PAP2 is not a Sipura. Ok it is in effect, but it isn't, if you know what
> I mean. Besides, the OP didn't say which Sipura he wanted. The PAP2 is
> effectively an SPA-2000 in different clothes, but it definitely isn't a
> 3000 or a 1001..!
There are some slight hardware differences between the PAP2 and Sipura-200x
Tim
| |
|
|
"Ivor Jones" <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote in message
news:4cmer6F16cthsU1@individual.net...
>
>
> <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
> news:m0lb62tq7smphlbvkcgajuv14g4g496of4@
4ax.com
>
> A PAP2 is not a Sipura. Ok it is in effect, but it isn't, if you know what
> I mean. Besides, the OP didn't say which Sipura he wanted. The PAP2 is
> effectively an SPA-2000 in different clothes, but it definitely isn't a
> 3000 or a 1001..!
>
> Ivor
Ivor, is a SPA-1001 OK?? Was thinking of buying one.
| |
| Ivor Jones 2006-05-16, 1:11 am |
|
"Bert" <private@private76756.net> wrote in message
news:4cscunF17rni9U1@individual.net
> "Ivor Jones" <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote in message
> news:4cmer6F16cthsU1@individual.net...
>
> Ivor, is a SPA-1001 OK?? Was thinking of buying one.
The 1001 has capacity for two SIP accounts but only one phone port. You
can select which account to dial out on by a prefix code and the phone
will ring with different ring cadences for each line, but obviously with
only one phone port you can only use one account at once, and I'm not
altogether sure what happens if you get an incoming call on line 2 while
you're on a call on line 1 etc., maybe someone with a 1001 can advise
further..? I have one coming as a spare and for travelling, but I haven't
got it yet so can't comment further.
Ivor
| |
| me@privacy.net 2006-05-16, 7:11 pm |
| On Sat, 13 May 2006 13:42:44 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>Get a pap2 from Currys digital and unlock it. Only £19.99. RRP £50+
I don't want a PAP2, I want a Sipura 2100. Where can I buy one retail
please?
| |
|
|
<me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:p1jj629k5geaevc76baefq5evcabst50hb@
4ax.com...
> On Sat, 13 May 2006 13:42:44 +0100, me@privacy.net wrote:
>
>
> I don't want a PAP2, I want a Sipura 2100. Where can I buy one retail
> please?
In London? No idea.
You could, however, have bought & received one from here
<http://www.provu.co.uk/sipura_linksys.html> in the time it's taken
between your first request & this one.
| |
| Brian A 2006-05-17, 7:11 am |
| On Tue, 16 May 2006 19:30:21 +0100, "Jono" <jmattwood@SPAMgmail.com>
wrote:
>http://www.provu.co.uk/sipura_linksys.html
Except that broadbandbuyer are considerably cheaper.
Provu: £75.75
BBB: £54.36
Remove 'no_spam_' from email address.
| |
| Brian A 2006-05-17, 1:11 pm |
| On Wed, 17 May 2006 11:24:35 GMT, Brian A
<no_spam_bca1000@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Tue, 16 May 2006 19:30:21 +0100, "Jono" <jmattwood@SPAMgmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>Except that broadbandbuyer are considerably cheaper.
>Provu: £75.75
>BBB: £54.36
>
>Remove 'no_spam_' from email address.
Just realised that the Provu price didn't even include VAT.
So revised comparision...
Provu: £89.00
BBB: £54.36
Difference:£34,65 !
(haven't checked out the postage but BBB don't overcharge afaik).
Remove 'no_spam_' from email address.
| |
| B. Wright 2006-05-24, 1:11 am |
| Ivor Jones <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:
> <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
> news:m0lb62tq7smphlbvkcgajuv14g4g496of4@
4ax.com
[vbcol=seagreen]
> A PAP2 is not a Sipura. Ok it is in effect, but it isn't, if you know what
> I mean. Besides, the OP didn't say which Sipura he wanted. The PAP2 is
> effectively an SPA-2000 in different clothes, but it definitely isn't a
> 3000 or a 1001..!
It actually can be a 1001 also (with the second physical port
being useless but still running two SIP accounts out port 1). Go look
around if you're interested in discovering how.
The 1001 is great, I prefer it to the 2000/2002 since it's
smaller and I never used the second port on my 2000s. I did, however,
use the dual SIP account feature many times on a 1001. It's too bad
Sipura never made it an option to combine both accounts onto one port on
the dual port adapters at the expense of not being able to use the
second port and/or run both accounts on both ports simultaneously.
|
|
|
|
|