| News Reader 2006-06-26, 1:11 pm |
|
"News Reader" <some@where.com> wrote in message
news:e7jfn5$ps7$1@nntp.aioe.org...
>
> Dear All,
>
> Re: Campaign for Correct Expiry Period on Finarea VOIP Service Mobile
> Top-Ups (and for a working communication channel / responses to enquiries
/
> e-mails / etc.!)
>
> I am sure ...
....
> the advertised, contracted, agreed
....
> the indicated and contracted expiry
> I am also sure that others have equally serious, significant and
legitimate
> / legal issues, queries, etc. that they require to be resolved /
> communicated to / with the various Finarea (VoIPCheap, VoIPStunt,
> SIPDiscount, Internetcalls, etc.) VoIP company services.
>
The essence of this post is about the requirement of Finarea / Betamax and
their stable of companies (VoIPCheap, VoIPStunt, SIPDiscount, Internetcalls,
etc.) to respond to legal issues / enquiries. I.e. particularly where they
have broken the law.
That they do not do this / fail to respond to such enquiries is unacceptable
and I believe illegal as they are trading as a business / represent a legal
entity contracting with consumer parties (home users).
I guess registered letters to their head office address may actually be the
only "sure" or sureish way to serve notices / communications on this
organisation.
Any other suggestions or thought about the setting up of a community / user
/ lobby / pressure / group / group representation body / etc. would be
appreciated / etc.
Best wishes,
News Reader
P.s. A complete list of these organisations internet (VoIP) services would
still be I
think quite valuable / useful / etc. (as well as as a bonus a list of
their landline services).
P.p.s. As previouosly - I.e. I think strength in numbers should ensure some
effective
resolution / action. A users / customer group / support / community entity
seems like it might be both useful and a good idea.
|