Voice Over IP in UK - [OT again] was: Re: Competitive rates for Voip Telephony

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Voice Over IP in UK > April 2007 > [OT again] was: Re: Competitive rates for Voip Telephony





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author [OT again] was: Re: Competitive rates for Voip Telephony
Paul Cupis

2007-04-06, 1:11 am

Ivor Jones wrote:
> "Paul Cupis" <paul@cupis.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:46158fb0.0@entanet
>
> No, it doesn't. Usenet calls newsgroups newsgroups, not forums.


A newsgroup is a forum - http://foldoc.org/?query=newsgroup

If it comes down to a definition in FOLDOC against a definition in the
unpublished "Dictionary of Ivor"...
John

2007-04-06, 7:11 am

In article <46159b54.0@entanet>, Paul Cupis <paul@cupis.co.uk> writes
>Ivor Jones wrote:
>
>A newsgroup is a forum - http://foldoc.org/?query=newsgroup
>
>If it comes down to a definition in FOLDOC against a definition in the
>unpublished "Dictionary of Ivor"...


Apologies for following up my earlier post so soon.

From my looks I see that technically both definitions are correct, but
Ivor has the benefit as the newsgroup discussions tend to define
themselves as newsgroups not forums or fora and the process is
considerably older.

The difference can be viewed at ...

For newsgroup definition see - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newsgroup

and

For forums see - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forums

--
John Clark
Paul Cupis

2007-04-06, 7:11 am

John wrote:
> In article <46159b54.0@entanet>, Paul Cupis <paul@cupis.co.uk> writes
>
> Apologies for following up my earlier post so soon.
>
> From my looks I see that technically both definitions are correct, but
> Ivor has the benefit as the newsgroup discussions tend to define
> themselves as newsgroups not forums or fora and the process is
> considerably older.


Do you have a reference which is not wikipedia, please?

Forums predate newgroups by by hundreds of years, and FOLDOC and the
Jargon file predate wikipedia.

> The difference can be viewed at ...
>
> For newsgroup definition see - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newsgroup
>
> and
>
> For forums see - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forums


Redirects to "Internet Forums" which Ivor and I would probably describe
as "web forums" and which we both know are very different to usenet.

I am not talking about "web forums", I am talking about forums.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/forum
#
[snip]
2. A public meeting place for open discussion.
3. A medium for open discussion or voicing of ideas, such as a
newspaper, a radio or television program, or a website.

# A public meeting or presentation involving a discussion usually among
experts and often including audience participation.
#

All very off-topic though.
Ivor Jones

2007-04-06, 1:11 pm



"Paul Cupis" <paul@cupis.co.uk> wrote in message
news:46159b54.0@entanet
> Ivor Jones wrote:
>
> A newsgroup is a forum -
> http://foldoc.org/?query=newsgroup
> If it comes down to a definition in FOLDOC against a
> definition in the unpublished "Dictionary of Ivor"...


www.usenet.org.uk is the definitive description of Usenet as far as I'm
concerned. Find me the word forum on that page.

Ivor


Paul Cupis

2007-04-06, 1:11 pm

Ivor Jones wrote:
> "Paul Cupis" <paul@cupis.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:46159b54.0@entanet
>
> www.usenet.org.uk is the definitive description of Usenet as far as I'm
> concerned. Find me the word forum on that page.


It doesn't define the word forum, and it's doesn't ban the use of it.
The dictionary does define the word forum.
Ivor Jones

2007-04-06, 1:11 pm



"Paul Cupis" <paul@cupis.co.uk> wrote in message
news:4616598e.0@entanet
> Ivor Jones wrote:
>
> It doesn't define the word forum, and it's doesn't ban
> the use of it. The dictionary does define the word forum.


I don't care what a dictionary says. A Usenet *Newsgroup* is not a forum
according to *Usenet convention*, which is what I go by when using the
system.

Ivor


Paul Cupis

2007-04-06, 1:11 pm

Ivor Jones wrote:
> I don't care what a dictionary says.


Okay.

I do.

Ivor Jones

2007-04-06, 1:11 pm



"Paul Cupis" <paul@cupis.co.uk> wrote in message
news:46165eb0.0@entanet
> Ivor Jones wrote:
>
> Okay.
>
> I do.


Ok, but you obviously don't care for the views of the *majority* of Usenet
users. I do.

Ivor


Paul Cupis

2007-04-06, 1:11 pm

Ivor Jones wrote:
> "Paul Cupis" <paul@cupis.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:46165eb0.0@entanet
>
> Ok, but you obviously don't care for the views of the *majority* of Usenet
> users. I do.


The *majority* of Usenet users do not try to "correct" people who use
the word forum. Taking this group as a sample, only 1 does. You.
clavox@btinternet.com

2007-04-06, 7:11 pm

On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 16:33:55 +0100, Paul Cupis <paul@cupis.co.uk>
wrote:

>Ivor Jones wrote:
>
>The *majority* of Usenet users do not try to "correct" people who use
>the word forum. Taking this group as a sample, only 1 does. You.

Chairman Ivor will correct anyone who post anything to this forum that
he dosen't like .
Ivor Jones

2007-04-06, 7:11 pm



"Paul Cupis" <paul@cupis.co.uk> wrote in message
news:46166895.0@entanet
> Ivor Jones wrote:
>
> The *majority* of Usenet users do not try to "correct"
> people who use the word forum. Taking this group as a
> sample, only 1 does. You.


The majority of users don't complain. Taking this group as an example,
only one does. You. (I don't count Ron).

Ivor


Ivor Jones

2007-04-07, 1:11 am

<clavox@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:g4ed13de4ikeh8ak1n7c7uo9u7b25ckiln@
4ax.com

[snip]

> Chairman Ivor will correct anyone who post anything to
> this forum that he dosen't like .


I haven't got to start yawning again, have I..? Thought we were over that
one.

Ivor


clavox@btinternet.com

2007-04-07, 7:11 am

On Sat, 7 Apr 2007 01:12:26 +0100, "Ivor Jones"
<ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:

><clavox@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:g4ed13de4ikeh8ak1n7c7uo9u7b25ckiln@
4ax.com
>
>[snip]
>
>
>I haven't got to start yawning again, have I..? Thought we were over that
>one.

You will be pleased to know we are and now starting on
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum
Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum Forum

Or of course you could have

FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN
FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN
FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN
FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN
FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN
FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN
FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN
FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN
FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN
FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN
FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN
FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN
FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN
FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN
FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN
FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN
FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN
FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN FORUM YAWN

Or any combination if is just as easy for me let me know there's a
good chap .
Richard H Huelin

2007-04-07, 1:11 pm

clavox@btinternet.com wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Apr 2007 01:12:26 +0100, "Ivor Jones"
> <ivor@despammed.invalid> wrote:
>
> You will be pleased to know we are and now starting on



> Or any combination if is just as easy for me let me know there's a
> good chap .


snip

You are so cute when you attempt to justify your stupidity.
Do it again.
clavox@btinternet.com

2007-04-07, 1:11 pm

On Sat, 07 Apr 2007 17:53:26 +0100, Richard H Huelin
<august2006@nospammershere.co.uk> wrote:

>clavox@btinternet.com wrote:
>
>
>
>snip
>
>You are so cute when you attempt to justify your stupidity.
> Do it again.

Damn it I had to re instill agent last night and forgot to put you and
on or two other morons back in the kill file I will put you back in
now before I forget .
Now FOAD .
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com