AOL Webserver - Re: Something wrong after 2006-05-12 21:25 (was Re: Weird "memory leak" prob

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > AOL Webserver > May 2006 > Re: Something wrong after 2006-05-12 21:25 (was Re: Weird "memory leak" prob





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Something wrong after 2006-05-12 21:25 (was Re: Weird "memory leak" prob
Janine Sisk

2006-05-17, 7:11 pm

> 1) ns_info patchlevel

3.3 apparently didn't have patchlevel, as that gave me an error. The
output of ns_version is 3.3.1+ad13

> 2) uname -a


Linux xxxxx.furfly.com 2.6.9-34.ELsmp #1 SMP Fri Feb 24 16:54:53 EST
2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux

> 3) glibc version


$ rpm -qa | grep glibc
glibc-kernheaders-2.4-9.1.98.EL
glibc-common-2.3.4-2.19
glibc-devel-2.3.4-2.19
glibc-2.3.4-2.19
glibc-headers-2.3.4-2.19

On May 17, 2006, at 1:34 PM, Dossy Shiobara wrote:

> On 2006.05.17, Zachary Shaw <zshaw@BRANDEIS.EDU> wrote:
>
> Dave Siktberg seems to have narrowed it down to 2006-05-12 21:25.
>
> What's interesting is I'm running AOLserver 4.0.10 on x86/Linux
> 2.6.15.6
> with glibc6 2.3.5 with no OpenACS and all my scheduled procs are
> firing
> just fine.
>
> Can we get everyone who's experiencing this problem to provide a few
> things:
>
> 1) ns_info patchlevel
> 2) uname -a
> 3) glibc version
>
> I'm betting this is an older Linux or LinuxThreads or glibc
> problem. I
> could be wrong, of course, but gathering this info will help to figure
> it out.
>
> -- Dossy
>
> --
> Dossy Shiobara | dossy@panoptic.com | http://dossy.org/
> Panoptic Computer Network | http://panoptic.com/
> "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own
> folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70)
>
>
> --
> AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/
>
> To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to
> <listserv@listserv.aol.com> with the
> body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the
> Subject: field of your email blank.
>



Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2009 webservertalk.com