| Dossy Shiobara 2007-10-01, 1:11 pm |
| On 2007.10.01, Tom Jackson <tom@RMADILO.COM> wrote:
> On the surface, the patch appears (as described) to do something like
> ns_returnfile. All the patch does is to make a copy of the connection
> and wrap the sock in a Tcl_Channel.
My only real concern about the change:
What happens if you try to [ns_chan create] on the Tcl channel returned
from [ns_conn channel]? Does the actual behavior line up with what one
might normally expect (i.e., Policy of Least Surprise)? Is the behavior
well-defined?
-- Dossy
--
Dossy Shiobara | dossy@panoptic.com | http://dossy.org/
Panoptic Computer Network | http://panoptic.com/
"He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own
folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70)
|