|
Home > Archive > Apache Server configuration support > September 2007 > High Avalaibility with Apache on Windows Systems
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
High Avalaibility with Apache on Windows Systems
|
|
| jodeva77 2007-09-13, 7:21 am |
| Hi
I'm new in this group. I'm introducing myself with a topic a bit
complicated ... ;-)
I'm trying to realize a cluster of servers based on Windows 2003
server System.
I'm using Apache HTTP Server 2.2 as load balancing web server and I
whould like to perform the high availability to avoid that it whoud
become a "single point of failure".
Does anybody know if it is possible to perform high avaliability
(maybe usying "heartbeat" technic) with Apache on servers based on
Windows Systems?
I have found only articles speaking about that for servers based on
linux systems.
Thx to everyone.
jodeva77
| |
| Trinity Of Matrix 2007-09-13, 7:21 am |
| jodeva77 schrieb:
> Hi
> I'm new in this group. I'm introducing myself with a topic a bit
> complicated ... ;-)
> I'm trying to realize a cluster of servers based on Windows 2003
> server System.
> I'm using Apache HTTP Server 2.2 as load balancing web server and I
> whould like to perform the high availability to avoid that it whoud
> become a "single point of failure".
>
> Does anybody know if it is possible to perform high avaliability
> (maybe usying "heartbeat" technic) with Apache on servers based on
> Windows Systems?
Tivoli System Automation exists also for Windows (its like heartbeat,
but with more features.
> I have found only articles speaking about that for servers based on
> linux systems.
There exists also hardware for this, some of them have also embedded
Linux on it. But at the end, I would suggest that you replace Windows
2003 Server with Linux or Solaris.
--
Regards,
Trinity Of Matrix
E-Mail (only for spammer): trinity.matrix@localhost.localdomain
| |
| jodeva77 2007-09-13, 1:28 pm |
| On 13 Set, 13:33, Trinity Of Matrix
<trinity.mat...@localhost.localdomain> wrote:
> jodeva77 schrieb:
>
>
>
> Tivoli System Automation exists also for Windows (its like heartbeat,
> but with more features.
>
>
> There exists also hardware for this, some of them have also embedded
> Linux on it. But at the end, I would suggest that you replace Windows
> 2003 Server with Linux or Solaris.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Trinity Of Matrix
> E-Mail (only for spammer): trinity.mat...@localhost.localdomain
Thx Trinity
I will follow your advice I will use linux based servers.
I have found a good explanation about how to do that:
http://www.howtoforge.com/ high_ava..._cl
uster
.... in that it is raccomanded to create 4 nodes on Debian Sarge
systems:
2 nodes for Apache and 2 for making load balance.
Then the high avaliability will be done by installing Ultra Monkey
(Open Source).
Do you think that I can trust in that articol using Debian Sarge or
can you advice me a more completed one?
Thx
jodeva77
| |
| jodeva77 2007-09-13, 1:28 pm |
| On 13 Set, 13:33, Trinity Of Matrix
<trinity.mat...@localhost.localdomain> wrote:
> jodeva77 schrieb:
>
>
>
> Tivoli System Automation exists also for Windows (its like heartbeat,
> but with more features.
>
>
> There exists also hardware for this, some of them have also embedded
> Linux on it. But at the end, I would suggest that you replace Windows
> 2003 Server with Linux or Solaris.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Trinity Of Matrix
> E-Mail (only for spammer): trinity.mat...@localhost.localdomain
Thx Trinity
I will follow your advice I will use linux based servers.
I have found a good explanation about how to do that:
http://www.howtoforge.com/ high_ava..._cl
uster
.... in that it is raccomanded to create 4 nodes on Debian Sarge
systems:
2 nodes for Apache and 2 for making load balance.
Then the high avaliability will be done by installing Ultra Monkey
(Open Source).
Do you think that I can trust in that article using Debian Sarge or
can you advice me a more completed one?
Thx
jodeva77
| |
| Ignoramus32529 2007-09-13, 1:28 pm |
| There is no such thing as "high availability on a Windows system".
i
|
|
|
|
|