|
Home > Archive > WebSphere Application Server > October 2004 > memory to memory session replication via client server
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
memory to memory session replication via client server
|
|
|
| I have an architecture question for someone who knows the internals of
memory to memory replication in client/server mode.
We have three boxes each running three app servers in a cluster running one
large application with session data that is updated often. Is it better to
have a replicator on each box with the appservers on that box only talking
to that replicator or is it better to have them talk to another boxes
replicator? Would it be better to use few replicators (say 2) for overhead
reasons? Should we have the replicators on a separate box from the
application servers?
Do the replication servers update among themselves based on options of High,
Medium, Low and Custom in Application Servers > [servername] > Web Container
> Session Management > Distributed Environment Settings > ?
Thanks,
Keith
| |
| Robert 2004-09-23, 5:55 pm |
| Hello,
Does DRS works correctly at your site? We've got a lot of problems with it,
on version 5.1.0.3.
Do you have explicitly installed the embedded messaging client & server? We
didn't do that because of the separate WebSphere MQ 5.3 installation on the
same (aix) box.
If you can help, thanks in advance,
Kind regards,
Robert
"Keith" <keith.athey@twc.state.tx.us> schreef in bericht
news:chssi5$654o$1@news.boulder.ibm.com...
>I have an architecture question for someone who knows the internals of
> memory to memory replication in client/server mode.
>
> We have three boxes each running three app servers in a cluster running
> one
> large application with session data that is updated often. Is it better to
> have a replicator on each box with the appservers on that box only talking
> to that replicator or is it better to have them talk to another boxes
> replicator? Would it be better to use few replicators (say 2) for overhead
> reasons? Should we have the replicators on a separate box from the
> application servers?
>
> Do the replication servers update among themselves based on options of
> High,
> Medium, Low and Custom in Application Servers > [servername] > Web
> Container
>
> Thanks,
>
> Keith
>
>
| |
| ggosseyn 2004-10-26, 7:47 am |
| Hello,
Please, note, the DRS doesn't need embedded messaging client & server to
work. It's use a internal messaging provides by Websphere AS.
If you want more information, please read the redbook "IBM WebSphere
Application Server V5.1 System Management and Configuration WebSphere
Handbook Series"
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/redbooks/pdfs/sg246195.pdf
chap. 9, § 9.9.2 WebSphere internal messaging.
In § 9.12, you have performance considerations with DRS.
Bye,
Gilbert
"Robert" <rhazeleger@wanadoo.nl> a écrit dans le message de
news:civ5ta$5ml8$1@news.boulder.ibm.com...
> Hello,
>
> Does DRS works correctly at your site? We've got a lot of problems with
it,
> on version 5.1.0.3.
> Do you have explicitly installed the embedded messaging client & server?
We
> didn't do that because of the separate WebSphere MQ 5.3 installation on
the
> same (aix) box.
>
> If you can help, thanks in advance,
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Robert
> "Keith" <keith.athey@twc.state.tx.us> schreef in bericht
> news:chssi5$654o$1@news.boulder.ibm.com...
to[vbcol=seagreen]
talking[vbcol=seagreen]
overhead[vbcol=seagreen]
>
>
|
|
|
|
|