|
Home > Archive > WebSphere Site Analyzer > January 2004 > Performance....
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
|
|
|
| Does anyone knows what can be wrong in my environment????
I know WebSphere Application Server but I don´t know how Web Site Analyzer
works...
I´ve an Intel Server with 2 processors/2GB RAM, on this server, i´ve
installed the Web Site Analyzer with all defaults, and it´s taking about
half of hour to process 50 MB of log... is this correct?
Another thing is, the WebSphere´s trace_sa.log is getting bigger and bigger,
something like 900MB.... do I need to leave the trace option working on this
server?????
Thanks in advance... Any help would be gracefull....
FabHas
| |
| Juan Manuel Martinez 2004-01-19, 3:03 pm |
| In article <bh82di$3sh2$1@news.boulder.ibm.com>, fhasegawa@equifax.com.br says...quote:
> I´ve an Intel Server with 2 processors/2GB RAM, on this server, i´ve
> installed the Web Site Analyzer with all defaults, and it´s taking about
> half of hour to process 50 MB of log... is this correct?
>
>
Which version have you installed? Performance has been improved in later releases. You
can also change some settings to improve performance.
--
Juanma Martinez
| |
|
|
Juanma,
First of all thanks for your answer, the version that we´re working on
is IBM Tivoli Web Site Analyzer V4.2 with WAS 4.0.5 and DB2 7.2 fix pak 7 .
[ ]´s
FabHas
"Juan Manuel Martinez" <juanma_martinez@es.ibm.com> escreveu na mensagem
news:MPG.19a1e650c3ed9a4198973b@news.software.ibm.com...quote:
> In article <bh82di$3sh2$1@news.boulder.ibm.com>, fhasegawa@equifax.com.br
says...quote:
> Which version have you installed? Performance has been improved in later
releases. Youquote:
> can also change some settings to improve performance.
> --
> Juanma Martinez
| |
| Farhan Thawar 2004-01-19, 3:03 pm |
| I'm guessing that you do need to leave the trace on, but everytime you
process the logs, you should be able to start from scratch right?
Since the processed logs are stored within Site Analyzer?
Farhan
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 09:33:08 -0300, "Fabio" <fhasegawa@equifax.com.br>
wrote:
quote:
>Does anyone knows what can be wrong in my environment????
>I know WebSphere Application Server but I don´t know how Web Site Analyzer
>works...
>
>I´ve an Intel Server with 2 processors/2GB RAM, on this server, i´ve
>installed the Web Site Analyzer with all defaults, and it´s taking about
>half of hour to process 50 MB of log... is this correct?
>
>Another thing is, the WebSphere´s trace_sa.log is getting bigger and bigger,
>something like 900MB.... do I need to leave the trace option working on this
>server?????
>
>Thanks in advance... Any help would be gracefull....
>FabHas
>
>
|
|
|
|
|