| Frank Küster 2004-10-07, 7:49 am |
| Tilo Schwarz <list@tilo-schwarz.de> wrote:
[vbcol=seagreen]
> On Thursday 07 October 2004 10:09, Frank K=FCster wrote:
>
> The intention of my answer was not to argue concerning the gnustep=20
> naming issue in any direction - I couldn't care less. The answer=20
> doesn't contain a single word regarding the naming discussion.
>
> The intention was to answer what I thought was a question of you:
>
The misunderstanding is that, since bundle has a meaning for developers
(in a GNUstep context), you read it as 'What is a ".bundle"'. I must
admit that I wasn't really interested in the answer.
What I meant was: 'What is the message you want to send to the user by
naming a package "foo.bundle" instead of "foo"'. It seems to me the
answer is: "There is no message". So my comment is: Why not keep it out
of the name (after choosing a sensible name for the application in the
first place)?
Regards, Frank
--=20
Frank K=FCster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Z=FCrich
Debian Developer
|