Debian Developers - Re: possible mass bug filing: spamassassin 3

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > October 2004 > Re: possible mass bug filing: spamassassin 3





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: possible mass bug filing: spamassassin 3
Clemens Schwaighofer

2004-10-10, 5:54 pm

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/07/2004 01:43 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * martin f krafft
>
> | What do you think?
>
> API changed generally means you bump soname. Why not for SA as well.
>
> Also, SA3 is useless, as it eats about half a gig of RAM on my
> system. Per child.
>


at office SA2 eats 89MB per daemon, and it opens a new daemon for each
damn mail ... becaue spamd can't handle multile connections, but SA3
can, so under the line SA3 is more efficient.

Furthermore, we should all know that Anti-Spam, Anti-Virus is a CPU &
memory hog. It needs tons of memory and fastest cpu ... always.

lg, clemens
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBaJOyjBz/ yQjBxz8RAl9AAKDWKEdE3jTwFeyl8aw1ka9Xqxg5
awCdHHPJ
gbGMGc2yL+2nbEZdDf/1eUI=
=drOc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2009 webservertalk.com