| Posts(1) | October 24, 2004, 2:47 am | Re: non-free firmware: driver in main or contrib? |
| Posts(1) | October 24, 2004, 2:47 am | Re: Security updates for sarge? |
| Posts(1) | October 23, 2004, 8:46 pm | Re: Security updates for sarge? |
| Posts(1) | October 23, 2004, 5:48 pm | Re: Security updates for sarge? |
| Posts(1) | October 23, 2004, 5:48 pm | Re: Security updates for sarge? |
| Posts(1) | October 23, 2004, 5:48 pm | Re: Security updates for sarge? |
| Posts(1) | October 23, 2004, 5:48 pm | Re: Security updates for sarge? |
| Posts(1) | October 23, 2004, 5:48 pm | Re: Release-critical Bugreport for May 14, 2004 |
| Posts(4) | October 23, 2004, 5:48 pm | ITH: basket ( was: About Basket packaging status) |
| Posts(1) | October 23, 2004, 5:48 pm | Re: Security updates for sarge? |
| Posts(1) | October 23, 2004, 5:48 pm | Re: Python executables inside libraries |
| Posts(1) | October 23, 2004, 5:48 pm | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 23, 2004, 5:48 pm | Re: Security updates for sarge? |
| Posts(1) | October 23, 2004, 5:48 pm | Re: Security updates for sarge? |
| Posts(1) | October 23, 2004, 5:48 pm | Re: Security updates for sarge? |
| Posts(1) | October 23, 2004, 5:48 pm | Re: Security updates for sarge? |
| Posts(23) | October 23, 2004, 5:48 pm | discover or alsa? |
| Posts(1) | October 23, 2004, 5:48 pm | Bug#277966: ITP: nokryptia -- Make MP3 files accessible to Nokia 5510 |
| Posts(1) | October 23, 2004, 5:48 pm | Re: Security updates for sarge? |
| Posts(1) | October 23, 2004, 5:48 pm | Re: Security updates for sarge? |
| Posts(1) | October 23, 2004, 5:48 pm | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(8) | October 23, 2004, 5:48 pm | NMU for libpaper |
| Posts(4) | October 23, 2004, 7:47 am | Does the Debian gpg key infrastructure support multiple sub-keys? |
| Posts(1) | October 23, 2004, 7:47 am | Bug#277898: ITP: multipath-tools -- Command-line utilities for administering multipath |
| Posts(1) | October 23, 2004, 7:47 am | Bug#277907: ITP: atlantis -- Lightweight web browser based on GTK-WebCore |
| Posts(1) | October 23, 2004, 2:47 am | Re: Security updates for sarge? |
| Posts(4) | October 23, 2004, 2:47 am | update-menus , Re: dpkg and selinux |
| Posts(1) | October 23, 2004, 2:47 am | Re: Security updates for sarge? |
| Posts(1) | October 23, 2004, 2:47 am | Re: Does the Debian gpg key infrastructure support multiple sub-keys? |
| Posts(1) | October 23, 2004, 2:47 am | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 23, 2004, 2:47 am | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 23, 2004, 2:47 am | Re: Security updates for sarge? |
| Posts(1) | October 22, 2004, 5:54 pm | Re: Security updates for sarge? |
| Posts(1) | October 22, 2004, 5:54 pm | Re: Mail Delivery (failure dailyhoroscope@mailer1.astronet.com) (KMM1187634 |
| Posts(1) | October 22, 2004, 5:54 pm | Re: Security updates for sarge? |
| Posts(2) | October 22, 2004, 5:54 pm | requirements regarding 'priorities' |
| Posts(1) | October 22, 2004, 5:54 pm | raptor crippled |
| Posts(1) | October 22, 2004, 5:54 pm | Re: Mail Delivery (failure dailyhoroscope@mailer1.astronet.com) (KMM1187634 |
| Posts(1) | October 22, 2004, 5:54 pm | Re: Security updates for sarge? |
| Posts(1) | October 22, 2004, 7:49 am | Softiware |
| Posts(1) | October 22, 2004, 7:49 am | Bug#53121: |
| Posts(1) | October 22, 2004, 7:49 am | Re: Your details |
| Posts(1) | October 22, 2004, 7:49 am | Softtware |
| Posts(1) | October 22, 2004, 7:49 am | Re: Security updates for sarge? |
| Posts(1) | October 22, 2004, 7:49 am | Re: Security updates for sarge? |
| Posts(1) | October 22, 2004, 7:49 am | Re: RE: Mail Delivery (failure dailyhoroscope@mailer1.astronet.com) (KMM1187634 |
| Posts(1) | October 22, 2004, 7:49 am | Re: Security updates for sarge? |
| Posts(1) | October 22, 2004, 7:49 am | Bug#277766: ITP: moniwiki -- MoniWiki is yet another WikiEngine written in PHP. It is |
| Posts(1) | October 22, 2004, 7:49 am | Re: Security updates for sarge? |
| Posts(1) | October 22, 2004, 7:49 am | Re: Security updates for sarge? |
| Posts(2) | October 22, 2004, 7:49 am | Security updates for sarge? (was: Ubuntu discussion at planet.debian.org) |
| Posts(1) | October 22, 2004, 2:47 am | Re: discover and hotplug must be able to co-exists |
| Posts(1) | October 22, 2004, 2:47 am | Bug#188899: NMU for libpaper |
| Posts(1) | October 22, 2004, 2:47 am | Bug#277748: ITP: libsbml -- Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML) |
| Posts(1) | October 22, 2004, 2:47 am | Bug#277746: ITP: mesord -- A stochastic simulator of coupled chemical reactions and di |
| Posts(2) | October 22, 2004, 2:47 am | orphaning packages |
| Posts(1) | October 21, 2004, 8:47 pm | Bug#277721: ITP: libnet-smpp-perl -- Net::SMPP is an implementation of Short Message P |
| Posts(1) | October 21, 2004, 5:57 pm | Re: Python executables inside libraries |
| Posts(1) | October 21, 2004, 5:57 pm | Re: Python executables inside libraries |
| Posts(1) | October 21, 2004, 5:57 pm | Document |
| Posts(1) | October 21, 2004, 5:57 pm | Document |
| Posts(1) | October 21, 2004, 5:57 pm | Bug#277706: ITP: libcompress-lzo-perl -- Perl bindings for LZO realtime compression li |
| Posts(17) | October 21, 2004, 5:57 pm | forwarding bugs to other packages |
| Posts(2) | October 21, 2004, 5:57 pm | Webmaster |
| Posts(1) | October 21, 2004, 5:57 pm | Bug#277658: ITP: smarty -- Template Engine for PHP |
| Posts(1) | October 21, 2004, 5:57 pm | Re: Bug#277550: ITP: patcher -- perl script useful for managing patches |
| Posts(1) | October 21, 2004, 5:56 pm | Re: discover and hotplug must be able to co-exists (was Re: discover or alsa?) |
| Posts(1) | October 21, 2004, 5:56 pm | Re: discover and hotplug must be able to co-exists (was Re: discover or alsa?) |
| Posts(1) | October 21, 2004, 5:56 pm | Re: discover and hotplug must be able to co-exists (was Re: discover or alsa?) |
| Posts(1) | October 21, 2004, 5:56 pm | Bug#276306: dpkg -P backuppc fails (debconf problem ?) |
| Posts(1) | October 21, 2004, 5:56 pm | Re: Xsession doesn't use umask setting from /etc/login.defs |
| Posts(1) | October 21, 2004, 5:56 pm | Re: Xsession doesn't use umask setting from /etc/login.defs |
| Posts(1) | October 21, 2004, 5:56 pm | Re: discover and hotplug must be able to co-exists (was Re: discover or alsa?) |
| Posts(1) | October 21, 2004, 7:48 am | Re: Xsession doesn't use umask setting from /etc/login.defs |
| Posts(1) | October 21, 2004, 2:48 am | Re: discover and hotplug must be able to co-exists (was Re: discover or alsa?) |
| Posts(2) | October 21, 2004, 2:48 am | discover and hotplug must be able to co-exists (was Re: discover or alsa?) |
| Posts(1) | October 21, 2004, 2:48 am | Re: discover and hotplug must be able to co-exists (was Re: discover or alsa?) |
| Posts(1) | October 20, 2004, 8:47 pm | Bug#277567: ITP: python-pyggy -- Lexer and GLR parser generator for Python |
| Posts(1) | October 20, 2004, 5:51 pm | Bug#277550: ITP: patcher -- perl script useful for managing patches |
| Posts(198) | October 20, 2004, 5:51 pm | Updating scanners and filters in Debian stable (3.1) |
| Posts(1) | October 20, 2004, 5:51 pm | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 20, 2004, 5:51 pm | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 20, 2004, 5:51 pm | Bug#277525: ITP: torrentocracy -- RSS (real simple syndication) plugin for MythTV |
| Posts(1) | October 20, 2004, 5:51 pm | Bug#277538: ITP: ac++ -- An Aspect Weaver for C/C++ |
| Posts(1) | October 20, 2004, 5:51 pm | Bug#276306: dpkg -P backuppc fails (debconf problem ?) |
| Posts(1) | October 20, 2004, 5:51 pm | OpenCASCADE - SALOME |
| Posts(1) | October 20, 2004, 5:51 pm | Bug#277514: ITP: geos -- geometry engine for geographic information systems |
| Posts(1) | October 20, 2004, 5:51 pm | Bug#277511: ITP: fet -- Timetable generator |
| Posts(4) | October 20, 2004, 5:51 pm | problem to import images inkscape |
| Posts(3) | October 20, 2004, 5:51 pm | membership and question |
| Posts(1) | October 20, 2004, 7:51 am | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 20, 2004, 7:51 am | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 20, 2004, 7:51 am | Bug#277498: ITP: libdate-simple-perl -- a simple date object |
| Posts(1) | October 20, 2004, 2:47 am | $B7Y9p!*%&%$%k%9%A%'%C%/%5!<(B $B%S%9(B |
| Posts(6) | October 20, 2004, 2:47 am | Maintenance of User-Mode Linux packages |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2004, 8:49 pm | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2004, 8:49 pm | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(3) | October 19, 2004, 8:49 pm | New ClamAV version uploaded, testers wanted |
| Posts(3) | October 19, 2004, 5:53 pm | Bug#277193: ITP: tagtool -- tool to tag and rename MP3 and Ogg Vorbis files |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2004, 5:53 pm | Bug#277426: ITP: flumotion -- Fluendo Streaming Server for audio and video |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2004, 5:53 pm | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2004, 5:53 pm | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(5) | October 19, 2004, 5:53 pm | Bug#277193: ITP: tagtool -- tool to tag and rename MP3 and Ogg Vorbis files |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2004, 5:53 pm | Re: Do _not_ file massbugs without consulting debian-devel (Re: Bug#277210: package de |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2004, 5:53 pm | Bug#276306: dpkg -P backuppc fails |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2004, 5:53 pm | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2004, 5:53 pm | gnome-2.8, evolution-2, and integrated vim |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2004, 5:53 pm | Re: Do _not_ file massbugs without consulting debian-devel (Re: Bug#277210: package de |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2004, 7:50 am | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2004, 7:50 am | Bug#276306: dpkg -P backuppc fails |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2004, 7:50 am | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2004, 7:50 am | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2004, 7:50 am | Re: Do _not_ file massbugs without consulting debian-devel (Re: Bug#277210: package de |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2004, 7:50 am | Re: Do _not_ file massbugs without consulting debian-devel (Re: Bug#277210: package de |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2004, 7:50 am | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2004, 7:50 am | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2004, 7:50 am | Re: Xsession doesn't use umask setting from /etc/login.defs |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2004, 7:50 am | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2004, 7:50 am | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2004, 7:50 am | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2004, 7:50 am | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2004, 7:50 am | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2004, 7:50 am | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2004, 2:48 am | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2004, 2:48 am | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2004, 2:48 am | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2004, 2:48 am | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2004, 2:48 am | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2004, 2:48 am | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2004, 2:48 am | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2004, 2:48 am | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 19, 2004, 2:48 am | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 18, 2004, 8:48 pm | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 18, 2004, 8:48 pm | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 18, 2004, 8:48 pm | Re: Xsession doesn't use umask setting from /etc/login.defs |
| Posts(1) | October 18, 2004, 8:48 pm | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 18, 2004, 8:48 pm | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 18, 2004, 8:48 pm | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 18, 2004, 8:48 pm | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 18, 2004, 8:48 pm | Virus incident |
| Posts(2) | October 18, 2004, 8:48 pm | Some file-in-etc-not-marked-as-conffile RC bugs |
| Posts(1) | October 18, 2004, 8:48 pm | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 18, 2004, 8:48 pm | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 18, 2004, 8:48 pm | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 18, 2004, 8:48 pm | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 18, 2004, 8:48 pm | Re: USB wireless |
| Posts(1) | October 18, 2004, 8:48 pm | Re: Reproducible, precompiled .o files: what say policy+gpl? |
| Posts(1) | October 18, 2004, 5:53 pm | Bug#277085: ITP: gnochm -- CHM file viewer for GNOME |
| Posts(1) | October 18, 2004, 5:53 pm | Bug#277087: ITP: python-pychm -- Python bindings for CHMLIB |
| Posts(1) | October 18, 2004, 7:51 am | Re: Xsession doesn't use umask setting from /etc/login.defs |