Debian Developers - Re: Is anyone packaging `lame' ?

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > December 2004 > Re: Is anyone packaging `lame' ?





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Is anyone packaging `lame' ?
Florian Weimer

2004-12-27, 7:47 am

* William Ballard:

> On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 07:04:22PM -0800, james wrote:
>
> It's patent-encumbered; all mp3 software is.


Yet mpg321 is in main. This comes from the misunderstanding that no
royalties are required for decoders (as opposed to encoders). This is
not true, though.

The MP3 situtation is even worse, there are two organizations holding
pools of essential patents on MP3, and you need separate licenses from
both. One organization is enforcing its patents actively against
redistributors of MP3 players in Europe.


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2009 webservertalk.com