Debian Developers - Re: Is anyone packaging `lame' ?

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > December 2004 > Re: Is anyone packaging `lame' ?





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: Is anyone packaging `lame' ?
Andrew Suffield

2004-12-27, 7:47 am

On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 11:34:03AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * William Ballard:
>
>
> Yet mpg321 is in main. This comes from the misunderstanding that no
> royalties are required for decoders (as opposed to encoders). This is
> not true, though.


Fraunhoffer only have patents on encoders, not decoders. They can't
charge you for decoders unless you're using their encoding patents.

(MPEG audio decoding is trivial and almost certainly not patentable)

--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |

Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2009 webservertalk.com