Debian Developers - Re: patents and software, not software patents [was: Is anyone packaging `lame' ?]

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > December 2004 > Re: patents and software, not software patents [was: Is anyone packaging `lame' ?]





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: patents and software, not software patents [was: Is anyone packaging `lame' ?]
Matthew Palmer

2004-12-27, 5:52 pm

On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 03:26:35PM +0100, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
> On Monday 27 December 2004 14:58, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> You lost me there:
> how can something that's explicitly excluded from being covered by patents
> possibly infringe a patent?


I presume that what Florian means is that, while you cannot patent a
software invention, an implementation in software of a patented process or
mechanism (which is otherwise implemented in some non-software form) is
still an infringement of the patent.

It wouldn't happen real often, but I can certainly imagine a few cases where
such a thing could happen.

- Matt

Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2009 webservertalk.com