Debian Developers - Bug #263322

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > December 2004 > Bug #263322





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Bug #263322
Turbo Fredriksson

2004-12-28, 6:07 pm

This 'wontfix' annoys me (togheter with a lot more crap
the postinst does).

I've had packages refused for released (same thing??) because
my package(s) breaks the policy, so why the "won't fix"!? It can
easily (without harm) be fixed at the same time as any other
security fix.

The bug was submitted on 3 Aug 2004, and AFTER that 1.3.26-0woody6
came out (12 Nov 2004) so this bug could/should have been fixed
there... !
--
Saddam Hussein cracking $400 million in gold bullion colonel Qaddafi
NORAD critical iodine quiche munitions KGB SEAL Team 6 [Hello to all
my fans in domestic surveillance] BATF Uzi
[See http://www.aclu.org/echelonwatch/index.html for more about this]


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Don Armstrong

2004-12-28, 6:07 pm

On Tue, 28 Dec 2004, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
> The bug was submitted on 3 Aug 2004, and AFTER that 1.3.26-0woody6
> came out (12 Nov 2004) so this bug could/should have been fixed
> there... !


No, this bug should not have been, and could not have been. The policy
for making changes in stable is very, very conservative:

The requirements for packages to get updated in stable are:
=20
1. The package fixes a security problem. An advisory by our own
Security Team is required. Updates need to be approved by the
Security Team.
=20
=20
2. The package fixes a critical bug which can lead into data
loss, data corruption, or an overly broken system, or the
package is broken or not usable (anymore).
=20
=20
3. The stable version of the package is not installable at all
due to broken or unmet dependencies or broken installation
scripts.
=20
=20
4. All released architectures have to be in sync.
=20
=20
5. The package gets all released architectures back in sync.
=20
=20
It is (or (and (or 1 2 3) 4) 5)[1]

Clearly, this bug doesn't satisfy 1, 2 or 3, and thus should not be
fixed in stable at all. As it has been fixed in testing and unstable,
I'm not quite sure what the problem is.


Don Armstrong

1: http://people.debian.org/~terpstra/....4b2f8105.en.h=
tml
--=20
[A] theory is falsifiable [(and therefore scientific) only] if the
class of its potential falsifiers is not empty.
-- Sir Karl Popper _The Logic of Scientific Discovery_ =A721

http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 webservertalk.com