|
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > February 2004 > digikam: build error on alpha
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
digikam: build error on alpha
|
|
| Paul Telford 2004-02-25, 12:33 pm |
|
When the alpha buildd tried to build my recent upload of digikam it gave
the following error:
/usr/bin/kde-config: error while loading shared libraries: libICE.so.6:
cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
configure: error: /usr/bin/kde-config --prefix outputed the non existant
prefix '' for kdelibs.
This means it has been moved since you installed it.
This won't work. Please recompile kdelibs for the new prefix.
xlibs (which contains libICE.so.6) is installed as a build-dep. Is this a
buildd problem or a maintainer problem? I searched the mailing lists for
info but found nothing similar.
Thanks,
--
Paul Telford | 1024D/431B38BA | pxt@debian.org | paul@droflet.net
C903 0E85 9AF5 1B80 6A5F F169 D7E9 4363 431B 38BA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Mike Furr 2004-02-25, 7:33 pm |
| On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 11:48, Paul Telford wrote:
> When the alpha buildd tried to build my recent upload of digikam it gave
> the following error:
I just recently filed 234772 after having a similar problem, although
I'm not sure exactly where the bug lies. The only thing that is clear
is that something is borked on several of the buildds. Could any
further info on this please cc 234772.
thanks
--
Mike Furr <mfurr@debian.org>
1024D/124B26F3 5B9F 587F BC5C D823 50CE 4DB0 ED93 CA29 124B 26F3
| |
| James Troup 2004-02-25, 8:33 pm |
| Mike Furr <mfurr@debian.org> writes:
> On Wed, 2004-02-25 at 11:48, Paul Telford wrote:
> I just recently filed 234772 after having a similar problem, although
> I'm not sure exactly where the bug lies. The only thing that is clear
> is that something is borked on several of the buildds. Could any
> further info on this please cc 234772.
See:
<http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/20...2/msg00862.html>
In short: it's not your problem, it'll be fixed by xfree86 4.3.0-3 and
your build should be retried sometime after that's available for the
architectures in question.
--
James
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Andreas Metzler 2004-02-26, 3:33 am |
| James Troup <james@nocrew.org> wrote:
> Mike Furr <mfurr@debian.org> writes:
[color=darkred]
> See:
> <http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/20...2/msg00862.html>
Hello,
Hm. This message of yours explains how (with only very minor
handholding) the buildds managed to build XFree86 4.0.3 itself and
does not say anything about #234772 or this thread afaict, because
#234772 obviously happened after XFree86 was _successfully_ built and
available to the buildd. (It installed a bunch of 4.0.3-2 packages.)
> In short: it's not your problem, it'll be fixed by xfree86 4.3.0-3 and
> your build should be retried sometime after that's available for the
> architectures in question.
I am happy to hear that.
I am nosy though, ;-) I would like to get an explanation what was
broken and how it was fixed, *if* somebody knowledgble would like to
spare the time.
cu andreas
--
Hey, da ist ein Ballonautomat auf der Toilette!
Unofficial _Debian-packages_ of latest unstable _tin_
http://www.logic.univie.ac.at/~amet...n/tin-snapshot/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Branden Robinson 2004-02-26, 12:34 pm |
| On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 08:51:40AM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> James Troup <james@nocrew.org> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> Hm. This message of yours explains how (with only very minor
> handholding) the buildds managed to build XFree86 4.0.3 itself and
> does not say anything about #234772 or this thread afaict, because
> #234772 obviously happened after XFree86 was _successfully_ built and
> available to the buildd. (It installed a bunch of 4.0.3-2 packages.)
Well, no, James's message also explained this:
[1] As I explained on IRC: sbuild installs new X library packages,
builds package, tries to remove them, postrm hangs due to missing
argument to grep, sbuild times out and kills the dpkg process,
dpkg gets confused and thinks the library package it was in the
process of removing is still "installed but with no files"... next
package that tries to use that library fails (often in bizarre
ways) because the library's not actually there.
>
> I am happy to hear that.
>
> I am nosy though, ;-) I would like to get an explanation what was
> broken and how it was fixed, *if* somebody knowledgble would like to
> spare the time.
The fix would appear to be uploading 4.3.0-3, which fixes the breakage
in the deregister_x_lib_dir_with_ld_so() shell function.
See the forthcoming package changelog[1][2] or the SVN commit log[3][4]
for more information.
[1] http://necrotic.deadbeast.net/xsf/X...ebian/changelog
[2] svn cat svn://necrotic.deadbeast.net/xfree86/trunk/debian/changelog
[3] http://necrotic.deadbeast.net/xsf/XFree86/CHANGELOG.txt
[4] svn log svn://necrotic.deadbeast.net/xfree86/
--
G. Branden Robinson | The first thing the communists do
Debian GNU/Linux | when they take over a country is to
branden@debian.org | outlaw cockfighting.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Oklahoma State Senator John Monks
| |
| Andreas Metzler 2004-02-26, 2:33 pm |
| Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 08:51:40AM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...][color=darkred]
[And Branden provided it]
Thanks for reteaching me how to read properly. ;-)
cu andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
|
|
|
|
|