Debian Developers - Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free sectio

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > March 2004 > Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free sectio





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Re: First Call for votes: General resolution for the handling of the non-free sectio
John Lines

2004-03-13, 5:33 am


> Is it too much if somebody says "Please let others know that I did
> wrote this manual? Also, please don't let them change my personal
> opinions about X, Y and Z."? Yes, it is too much and that's why we
> need GNU FDL.
>
> # #181494: GNU Free Documentation License is non-free Package:
> glibc; Severity: serious; Reported by: "Brian M. Carlson"
> <sandals@crustytoothpaste.ath.cx>; Tags: sarge, sarge-ignore, sid,
> woody; 1 year and 99 days old.
>
> Declare it as nonfree and I will quit immediatly using Debian, and I
> will remove Debian from my relatives and friends too. If A -> B.
> --


This is why I think it is unfortunate, but too late, that the section was
called 'non-free' and not 'read-the-licence'.

Once you have read the DFSG you, as a user, or distributor, of Debian packages
know what you can do with packages in main or contrib. A package being in
non-free simply means that you have to read the licence, and this is exactly
what the authors of GFDL documents want you to do. They chose that particular
licence because they want the reader to be aware that there are particularly
privileged sections of the documentation - thus drawing the readers attention
to them.

The problem is that there are people who think that the section should be
called 'evil' and that when a package is moved to non-free it is a judgement
of its moral quality - but it is more of an indicator that it requires special
treatment - and this is requested by the author - not imposed by Debian.

Have you read the side of a RedHat boxed set ? I dont have one handy but it
says words to the effect of 'The software in this box is written by lots of
different people and is licenced under lots of different licences - to find
out more read the individual licences' - in other words it is all in
'read-the-licence'.

To quit using Debian because Debian tries harder than any other distribution
to be clear about licencing would be counter productive.

John


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2009 webservertalk.com