|
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > March 2004 > kernel 2.4 packages cleanup
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
kernel 2.4 packages cleanup
|
|
| Adrian Bunk 2004-03-23, 9:35 pm |
| Below is a list of kernel 2.4 source packages < 2.4.25 and packages
(build) depending on them except for non-architecture kernel patches
that will be handled in a separate mail.
older 2.4 kernel:
- kernel-image-2.4.16-lart (#)
- kernel-image-2.4.16-netwinder (#)
- kernel-image-2.4.16-riscpc (#)
- kernel-image-2.4.17-s390 (#)
- kernel-image-2.4.18-i386bf (*)
- kernel-patch-2.4.17-s390 (*)
kernel 2.4.19:
- kernel-image-2.4.19-arm
- kernel-image-2.4.19-s390
- kernel-patch-2.4.19-arm
- kernel-patch-2.4.19-mips
required for several DECstation's
-> linux-kernel-di-mipsel
- kernel-patch-2.4.19-s390
- kernel-source-2.4.19
kernel 2.4.20:
- kernel-headers-2.4.20-m68k
- kernel-image-2.4.20-amiga
- kernel-image-2.4.20-atari
- kernel-image-2.4.20-bvme6000
- kernel-image-2.4.20-mac
- kernel-image-2.4.20-mvme147
- kernel-image-2.4.20-mvme16x
- kernel-patch-2.4.20-apus
- kernel-patch-2.4.20-hppa
- kernel-patch-2.4.20-m68k
- kernel-source-2.4.20
kernel 2.4.21:
- kernel-image-2.4.21-s390
-> linux-kernel-di
- kernel-patch-2.4.21-hppa
- kernel-patch-2.4.21-s390
- kernel-source-2.4.21
kernel 2.4.22:
- kernel-image-2.4.22-xfs (*)
- kernel-patch-2.4.22-mips
-> linux-kernel-di-mips
- kernel-patch-2.4.22-powerpc
- kernel-source-2.4.22
-> uclibc
kernel 2.4.24:
- kernel-headers-2.4.24-m68k
- kernel-image-2.4.24-alpha
-> linux-kernel-di
- kernel-image-2.4.24-atari
- kernel-image-2.4.24-bvme6000
- kernel-image-2.4.24-i386
- kernel-image-2.4.24-mac
- kernel-image-2.4.24-mvme147
- kernel-image-2.4.24-mvme16x
- kernel-image-sparc-2.4
needs to be updated to 2.4.25
-> linux-kernel-di
-> linux-kernel-di-sparc
BTW: why do both build depend on the sparc kernel images
and provide the corresponding di binary packages?
- kernel-patch-2.4.24-m68k
- kernel-source-2.4.24
-> user-mode-linux
build from kernel-source-2.6.4?
-> denotes another package (build-) depending on this package
(*) a bug asking for the removal of this package already existed
(#) I've sent a RC bug (can't fulfill the build depencies)
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Nathanael Nerode 2004-03-23, 9:35 pm |
| Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Below is a list of kernel 2.4 source packages < 2.4.25 and packages
> (build) depending on them except for non-architecture kernel patches
> that will be handled in a separate mail.
Thanks for all your work on this!
Christian T. Steiges said recently (in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-deve...3/msg01511.html)
that it was OK to remove all but the newest 2.4.x packages for m68k, so I
filed a bug to remove them.
> - kernel-source-2.4.24
> -> user-mode-linux
> build from kernel-source-2.6.4?
Yes please. ;-)
--
Make sure your vote will count.
http://www.verifiedvoting.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Adam Heath 2004-03-23, 10:34 pm |
| On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Below is a list of kernel 2.4 source packages < 2.4.25 and packages
> (build) depending on them except for non-architecture kernel patches
> that will be handled in a separate mail.
>
> -> denotes another package (build-) depending on this package
> (*) a bug asking for the removal of this package already existed
> (#) I've sent a RC bug (can't fulfill the build depencies)
I noticed that my recently uploaded xen packages are missing a depends on
kernel-source-2.4.25, and that you attempted to build them, getting a FTBFS.
This is all fixed now; I'll upload tomorrow.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Matt Zimmerman 2004-03-23, 11:34 pm |
| On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 02:59:58AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> - kernel-source-2.4.24
> -> user-mode-linux
> build from kernel-source-2.6.4?
UML needs a 2.4 kernel presently (I may build from 2.6 in addition, but not
in stead). Usually it lags a bit behind upstream kernel releases; there
will likely be a 2.4.25 patch released at some point. If not, I can
probably build against 2.4.25 with the 2.4.24 patch (though this would cause
some confusion among UML users).
--
- mdz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Colin Watson 2004-03-24, 12:34 am |
| On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 02:59:58AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> - kernel-patch-2.4.20-apus
I believe this can go soon in favour of the 2.4.25 one, now in unstable,
but let's wait for that to propagate to testing first.
> -> linux-kernel-di
> -> linux-kernel-di-sparc
> BTW: why do both build depend on the sparc kernel images
> and provide the corresponding di binary packages?
Because linux-kernel-di and linux-kernel-di-* just take existing
kernel-image packages and split them up into udeb-shaped pieces that d-i
can use as installer components.
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Herbert Xu 2004-03-24, 4:34 am |
| On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 02:59:58AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> - kernel-image-2.4.24-alpha
> - kernel-image-2.4.24-i386
#237727
--
Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Christian T. Steigies 2004-03-24, 5:20 pm |
| On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 09:17:04PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Christian T. Steiges said recently (in
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-deve...3/msg01511.html)
> that it was OK to remove all but the newest 2.4.x packages for m68k, so I
> filed a bug to remove them.
Maybe I was a little too quick, I forgot to build kernel-headers for 2.4.25
(doing that now). Also maybe we can wait two more days for the kernel-images
to appear in testing? But other than that, go ahead and remove them, thanks
for filing the bug.
Christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Adrian Bunk 2004-03-24, 7:36 pm |
| On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 06:26:12PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 02:59:58AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> #237727
:-)
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Adrian Bunk 2004-03-30, 6:37 pm |
| On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 07:51:41PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 02:59:58AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
>
> UML needs a 2.4 kernel presently (I may build from 2.6 in addition, but not
> in stead). Usually it lags a bit behind upstream kernel releases; there
> will likely be a 2.4.25 patch released at some point. If not, I can
> probably build against 2.4.25 with the 2.4.24 patch (though this would cause
> some confusion among UML users).
I was more thinking in the direction whether upstream will still support
2.4 in let's say 2.4.40, or whether user-mode-linux might under some
circumstances become unbuildable in Debian 3.1.
> - mdz
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
|
|
|
|
|