|
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > April 2004 > openh323, pwlib, and sarge
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
openh323, pwlib, and sarge
|
|
| Joe Buck 2004-04-02, 3:34 pm |
|
Taking a glance at http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/toplist.html :
It would seem that openh323 and pwlib could be hinted to go into sarge
together, except that openh323 is not yet built on sparc.
Anyone know why the sparc build failed? The attempt to install the
build dependencies failed on March 31:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
libpt-dbg: Depends: libpt-dev (= 1.5.2-4) but it is not going to be installed
-----------------------------------------------------------------
But the identical package installed and built on m68k OK on March 22,
successfully installing libpt-dev. Anyone know why the libpt-dev install
failed?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Goswin von Brederlow 2004-04-02, 9:34 pm |
| Hi,
you should realy ask this on the debian-sparc list and the sparc
buildd admin(s). Better chance of getting a usefull reply.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Steve Langasek 2004-04-03, 12:34 pm |
| On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 11:48:49AM -0800, Joe Buck wrote:
> Taking a glance at http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/toplist.html :
> It would seem that openh323 and pwlib could be hinted to go into sarge
> together, except that openh323 is not yet built on sparc.
> Anyone know why the sparc build failed? The attempt to install the
> build dependencies failed on March 31:
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
> Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
> libpt-dbg: Depends: libpt-dev (= 1.5.2-4) but it is not going to be installed
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> But the identical package installed and built on m68k OK on March 22,
> successfully installing libpt-dev. Anyone know why the libpt-dev install
> failed?
According to <http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?...rc&pkg=openh323>,
openh323 has already been rebuilt on sparc.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
| |
| Andreas Metzler 2004-04-03, 1:33 pm |
| Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 11:48:49AM -0800, Joe Buck wrote:
[...][color=darkred]
[...][color=darkred]
> According to <http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?...rc&pkg=openh323>,
> openh323 has already been rebuilt on sparc.
It has not only been built but even been uploaded. It is sitting in
incoming.
cu andreas
--
NMUs aren't an insult, they're not an attack, and they're
not something to avoid or be ashamed of.
Anthony Towns in 2004-02 on debian-devel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Joe Buck 2004-04-04, 1:34 am |
| Steve Lagasek wrote:
> According to <http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?...rc&pkg=openh323 <http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?...rc&pkg=openh323>>,
> openh323 has already been rebuilt on sparc.
Yes, that happened after I wrote the message; no idea whether it had anything
to do with my message, probably not.
Now what is needed is for someone to hint that openh323 and pwlib should go in
together, as the automatic system can't figure this out by itself.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
| |
| Steve Langasek 2004-04-05, 1:36 am |
| On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 09:59:37PM -0800, Joe Buck wrote:
> Steve Lagasek wrote:
[color=darkred]
> Yes, that happened after I wrote the message; no idea whether it had
> anything
> to do with my message, probably not.
> Now what is needed is for someone to hint that openh323 and pwlib should go
> in together, as the automatic system can't figure this out by itself.
Well, they've been hinted, but won't actually make it into testing until
gnomemeeting, openh323gk, and t38modem are also ready to go.
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
| |
| Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo 2004-04-05, 8:34 am |
| El día 04 abr 2004, Steve Langasek escribía:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 09:59:37PM -0800, Joe Buck wrote:
>
>
>
> Well, they've been hinted, but won't actually make it into testing until
> gnomemeeting, openh323gk, and t38modem are also ready to go.
GnomeMeeting is only held by a unreproducible bug, which will be
downgraded as soon as m68k package is uploaded. I'm contacting Mark
Purcell about the other two packages.
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
jsogo@debian.org
|
|
|
|
|