Debian Developers - oldlibs & who determines Sections (was Re: raising severity of reports filed for p

This is Interesting: Free IT Magazines  
Home > Archive > Debian Developers > April 2004 > oldlibs & who determines Sections (was Re: raising severity of reports filed for p





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author oldlibs & who determines Sections (was Re: raising severity of reports filed for p
Nathanael Nerode

2004-04-04, 4:35 am

Adrian Bunk wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 09:11:56PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>
> Let's check, it's used on hppa for:
> - kernel images
> - QT2
> - old fltk
>
> I don't know the status of building kernels with gcc 3.3 on hppa.
>
> On i386, there are only two packages in unstable that depend on QT2
> (vipec and gutenbrowser), so there might now be the time to completely
> remove QT2 from unstable?


Or rather, to move it to 'oldlibs'; it might be used by third-party
binaries.

Actually, I have a *lot* of candidates for 'oldlibs'... how does one go
about suggesting such moves? Who's authoritative; is it the ftpmasters or
the package?

--
Make sure your vote will count.
http://www.verifiedvoting.org/


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Sponsored Links






Free braindumps | Software forum | Database administration forum

Copyright 2003 - 2009 webservertalk.com