| Christoph Martin 2004-06-30, 3:38 am |
| Rene Mayrhofer schrieb:
> So please tell me what you think. If there's no real compelling reason
> to keep both, I'd really like to drop freeswan in favor of openswan.
I just had the case that freeswan would not work anymore. A disabled a
tunnel some time ago, build a new kernel later and wanted to enable it
last week. It is a roadwarrior setup, where on the server side pluto
just segfaults when an ipsec connection is tried to be established. I
used freeswan-modules-source_2.04-7. 2.04-9 was not buildable. The
discussion about openswan come just in time. I tried openswan an it
worked out of the box. So I will try to replace freeswan with all of my
tunnels (~10) in the next time.
Thanks
Christoph
--
========================================
====================================
Christoph Martin, EDV der Verwaltung, Uni-Mainz, Germany
Internet-Mail: Christoph.Martin@Uni-Mainz.DE
Telefon: +49-6131-3926337
|