| Andreas Barth 2004-07-11, 5:51 pm |
| * D. Starner (shalesller@writeme.com) [040710 22:25]:
> [...]
[vbcol=seagreen]
> For four months, Debian has known of blatant copyright infringement
> in its archives. We have done nothing. How is that going to look in
> court?
Please re-read this message:
| debian-legal has adjudged the QPL non-free, and the maintainer refuses
| to move this package to non-free; therefore, I am requesting its
| removal in an effort to lower the number of RC bugs. See the -legal
| discussion [0].
Where does it tell that we do copyright infringments? So, please don't
exaggerate.
> This is not some argument whether a license is free or non-free, or
> whether we offended a mostly friendly upstream's license in some
> minor way.
Well, than perhaps the requester should provide this information, and
not speaking about a particular license being non-free (and in
reality, there is still ongoing discussion).
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
|