| Simon Huggins 2004-07-16, 5:54 pm |
| Hiya Debian,
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 06:28:45PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Simon Huggins <huggie@earth.li> writes:
> The way the information is presented is different and the graphs are
> unique (i.e. a brief history of the data from buildd.d.o).
Yes it splits out the graphs which is possibly useful. Nothing that
can't be generated from the /stats/ bits of buildd.debian.org though
right?
It also seems to have grown some arbitrary voting script. Nice. Is it
going to have full slashdot news soon?
> You can't see what the "Needs-build" was yesterday on buildd.d.o but
> you can on buildd.net. That often shows problems that aren't aparent
> from buildd.d.o at all.
So fold this stuff into the buildd.d.o code or make www.buildd.net
better in a mature way but don't just cut out architectures for random
reasons.
Simon.
--
[ "Somebody's poisoned the waterhole!" ]
Black Cat Networks. http://www.blackcatnetworks.co.uk/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
|