| Goswin von Brederlow 2004-07-16, 5:54 pm |
| Simon Huggins <huggie@earth.li> writes:
> Hiya Debian,
>
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 06:28:45PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> Yes it splits out the graphs which is possibly useful. Nothing that
> can't be generated from the /stats/ bits of buildd.debian.org though
> right?
It is generated from the wanna-build stats available from buildd.d.o
(and debian-amd64.alioth.d.o).
> It also seems to have grown some arbitrary voting script. Nice. Is it
> going to have full slashdot news soon?
Huh? Something new? Fun.
>
> So fold this stuff into the buildd.d.o code or make www.buildd.net
Feel free to talk Ryan into it. His comment was that "all the info is
already there". Change his mind. Ingo didn't prevent that from
hapening, Ryan did.
> better in a mature way but don't just cut out architectures for random
> reasons.
Its not random.
The pages and graphs were made to display the status of the archs and
track down problems. Tracking problems is quite useless if the buildd
admin can't be reached to fix the problems or update the reason for
the problems. Its also a real waste of money.
When the decision was made the bandwith requirement was 3GB traffic
per arch and month. Meanwhile the amount was reduced to about 200 MB
per arch and month but its still bandwith someone has to pay.
Change their minds or get another buildd added for the arch with an
admin that cooperates. Ingo is willing to add more archs given that
there is some cooperation from the other side.
> Simon.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
|